ArticleMolecular genetics and genomics : MGG2018
Widespread antisense transcription of Populus genome under drought.
Article in Molecular genetics and genomics : MGG, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Antisense Transcription in Plants: A Systematic Review and an Update on cis-NATs of Sugarcane.International journal of molecular sciences · 2022Pooled it
- Identification of Kunitz-Type Inhibitor Gene Family ofInternational journal of molecular sciences · 2024Article
- Identification and characterization of a novel group of natural anti-sense transcripts from RNA1.2 gene locus of human cytomegalovirus.Chinese medical journal · 2019Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Antisense transcription is widespread in many genomes and plays important regulatory roles in gene expression. The objective of our study was to investigate the extent and functional relevance of antisense transcription in forest trees. We employed Populus, a model tree species, to probe the antisense transcriptional response of tree genome under drought, through stranded RNA-seq analysis. We detected nearly 48% of annotated Populus gene loci with antisense transcripts and 44% of them with co-transcription from both DNA strands. Global distribution of reads pattern across annotated gene regions uncovered that antisense transcription was enriched in untranslated regions while sense reads were predominantly mapped in coding exons. We further detected 1185 drought-responsive sense and antisense gene loci and identified a strong positive correlation between the expression of antisense and sense transcripts. Additionally, we assessed the antisense expression in introns and found a strong correlation between intronic expression and exonic expression, confirming antisense transcription of introns contributes to transcriptional activity of Populus genome under drought. Finally, we functionally characterized drought-responsive sense-antisense transcript pairs through gene ontology analysis and discovered that functional groups including transcription factors and histones were concordantly regulated at both sense and antisense transcriptional level. Overall, our study demonstrated the extensive occurrence of antisense transcripts of Populus genes under drought and provided insights into genome structure, regulation pattern and functional significance of drought-responsive antisense genes in forest trees. Datasets generated in this study serve as a foundation for future genetic analysis to improve our understanding of gene regulation by antisense transcription.
Indexed as
Identifiers
29876646What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.