ReviewHNO2018
Eosinophilic esophagitis: an underdiagnosed cause of dysphagia and food impaction to be recognized by otolaryngologists.
Review in HNO, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed, 5 citations in OpenAlex.
- Recommendations for the diagnosis and management of eosinophilic esophagitis in adults and children in Canada: a Delphi consensus project.Journal of the Canadian Association of Gastroenterology · 2025Review
- Recommendations for the diagnosis and management of eosinophilic esophagitis in adults and children in Canada: a Delphi consensus project.Allergy, asthma, and clinical immunology : official journal of the Canadian Society of Allergy and Clinical Immunology · 2025Review
- Opposing roles of eosinophils in cancer.Cancer immunology, immunotherapy : CII · 2019Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Eosinophilic esophagitis (EoE) is a recently recognised pathologic entity whose prevalence has risen significantly since first being described in 1993. Defined as a chronic, local immune-mediated disease with predominant eosinophil infiltration, it is nowadays the leading cause of dysphagia and food bolus impaction in children and young adults. Genetic and environmental risk factors, and especially food antigens, trigger the disease and are in the focus of investigation as avoidance can cure three quarters of patients. The most common antigen involved is milk, followed by egg and gluten. These patients frequently come undiagnosed to the otolaryngologist with complaints of dysphagia and recurrent non-sharp food impactions, although pharyngolaryngeal reflux symptoms and other airway complaints could also be a first sign. Delayed diagnosis and treatment can produce fibrostenosis of the esophagus that greatly impairs patients' quality of life.In-office transnasal esophagoscopy with esophageal biopsy offers a unique opportunity to promptly diagnose and follow-up these patients, without causing the morbidity of repeated sedations and reducing exploration overload in gastroenterology departments. The search for food-antigen triggers, response evaluation to swallowed steroids, or proton pump inhibitors (PPIs) make multiple endoscopies and biopsies necessary every 6 to 8 weeks.There are three first-line interchangeable treatments with the same recommendation: PPIs, dietary allergen elimination and topical swallowed steroids. The choice should be discussed with the patient on an individual basis.The objective of this article is to raise awareness of this condition, update otolaryngologists with the new EoE consensus, and highlight the need for biopsy in patients with dysphagia to rule out EoE.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.