Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29876619›Full record

ArticleEuropean journal of nuclear medicine and molecular imaging2018

Prospective comparison of

Helle D Zacho, Julie B Nielsen, Ali Afshar-Oromieh, Uwe Haberkorn, Nandita deSouza, Katja De Paepe, Katja Dettmann, Niels C Langkilde, Christian Haarmark, Rune V Fisker and 4 more

Open access · bronzeAbstract readComparative Study
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in European journal of nuclear medicine and molecular imaging, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 44 papers, 4 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
44citing papers in PubMed, 4 pooled it
10.3field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

44 citing papers in PubMed, 4 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 93 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. PSMA PET for primary lymph node staging of intermediate and high-risk prostate cancer: an expedited systematic review.Cancer imaging : the official publication of the International Cancer Imaging Society · 2020
    Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Trial
  6. Comparison ofBMC medical imaging · 2020
    Trial
  7. Prospective Comparison of PET Imaging with PSMA-TargetedJournal of nuclear medicine : official publication, Society of Nuclear Medicine · 2020
    Trial
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Controversies in the use of next-generation imaging for evaluation and treatment decision-making in patients with prostate cancer after biochemical recurrence: views from a Spanish expert panel.Clinical & translational oncology : official publication of the Federation of Spanish Oncology Societies and of the National Cancer Institute of Mexico · 2025
    Review
  12. Review
  13. Prospective Head-to-Head Comparison ofJournal of nuclear medicine : official publication, Society of Nuclear Medicine · 2025
    Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Review
  18. Hybrid imaging with [Cancer imaging : the official publication of the International Cancer Imaging Society · 2022
    Article
  19. Comparison ofEuropean journal of hybrid imaging · 2022
    Article
  20. Comparison ofWorld journal of nuclear medicine · 2022
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

14 authors at 7 institutions in 4 countries.

Helle D ZachoDepartment of Nuclear Medicine and Clinical Cancer Research Center, Aalborg University Hospital, Hobrovej 18-22, Postboks 365, DK-9100, Aalborg, Denmark. h.zacho@rn.dk.ORCID 0000-0001-9089-288X
Julie B NielsenDepartment of Nuclear Medicine and Clinical Cancer Research Center, Aalborg University Hospital, Hobrovej 18-22, Postboks 365, DK-9100, Aalborg, Denmark.
Ali Afshar-OromiehDepartment of Nuclear Medicine, University Hospital Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany.
Uwe HaberkornDepartment of Nuclear Medicine, University Hospital Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany.
Nandita deSouzaThe Institute of Cancer Research and Royal Marsden NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK.
Katja De PaepeThe Institute of Cancer Research and Royal Marsden NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK.
Katja DettmannDepartment of Urology, Regional Hospital West Jutland, Holstebro, Denmark.
Niels C LangkildeDepartment of Urology, Aalborg University Hospital, Aalborg, Denmark.
Christian HaarmarkDepartment of Clinical Physiology and Nuclear Medicine, Herlev and Gentofte Hospital, Herlev, Denmark.
Rune V FiskerDepartment of Nuclear Medicine and Clinical Cancer Research Center, Aalborg University Hospital, Hobrovej 18-22, Postboks 365, DK-9100, Aalborg, Denmark.
Dennis T ArpDepartment of Medical Physics, Oncology Department, Aalborg University Hospital, Aalborg, Denmark.
Jesper CarlDepartment of Oncology, Naestved Sygehus, Zealand University Hospital, Roskilde, Denmark.
Jørgen B JensenDepartment of Urology, Regional Hospital West Jutland, Holstebro, Denmark.
Lars J PetersenDepartment of Nuclear Medicine and Clinical Cancer Research Center, Aalborg University Hospital, Hobrovej 18-22, Postboks 365, DK-9100, Aalborg, Denmark.
Aalborg University Hospital · DKHeidelberg University · DERoyal Marsden NHS Foundation Trust · GBAarhus University · DKGentofte Hospital · DKRegional Hospital West Jutland · DKZealand University Hospital · DK

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeTo prospectively compare diagnostic accuracies for detection of bone metastases by

methodsSixty-eight PCa patients with BCR participated in this prospective study. The patients underwent

resultsTen of the 68 patients were diagnosed with bone metastases. On a patient level, sensitivity, specificity and the area under the curve (AUC) by receiver operating characteristic analysis were, respectively, 0.80, 0.98-1.00 and 0.89-0.90 for

conclusion

Indexed as

Diffusion Magnetic Resonance ImagingOligopeptidesPositron Emission Tomography Computed TomographySodium FluorideAgedAged, 80 and overBone NeoplasmsEdetic AcidFluorine RadioisotopesGallium IsotopesGallium RadioisotopesHumansMaleMiddle AgedProspective StudiesProstatic NeoplasmsEdetic AcidFluorine-18Fluorine Radioisotopesgallium 68 PSMA-11Gallium IsotopesGallium RadioisotopesOligopeptidesSodium FluorideBone metastasesDiffusion-weighted MRINaF-PET/CTProstate cancerPSMA-PET/CT

Identifiers

PMID29876619
OpenAlexW2805939695

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.