Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29876600›Full record

ReviewDer Nervenarzt2018

[Diagnosis of multiple sclerosis: revision of the McDonald criteria 2017].

O Aktas, M P Wattjes, M Stangel, H-P Hartung

Abstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Der Nervenarzt, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

O AktasKlinik für Neurologie, Medizinische Fakultät, und Zentrum für Neurologie und Neuropsychiatrie, LVR Klinikum Heinrich-Heine-Universität Düsseldorf, Moorenstr. 5, 40225, Düsseldorf, Deutschland.
M P WattjesInstitut für Diagnostische und Interventionelle Radiologie, Medizinische Hochschule Hannover, Hannover, Deutschland.
M StangelKlinische Neuroimmunologie und Neurochemie, Klinik für Neurologie, Medizinische Hochschule Hannover, Hannover, Deutschland.
H-P HartungKlinik für Neurologie, Medizinische Fakultät, und Zentrum für Neurologie und Neuropsychiatrie, LVR Klinikum Heinrich-Heine-Universität Düsseldorf, Moorenstr. 5, 40225, Düsseldorf, Deutschland. hans-peter.hartung@uni-duesseldorf.de.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Multiple sclerosis (MS) is the most common chronic autoimmune disorder of the central nervous system (CNS) largely affecting young adults. The diagnosis of MS is based on two pillars: 1) detection of the spatial and temporal dissemination of focal neurological deficits and 2) exclusion of important differential diagnoses. The current revision of the diagnostic criteria (McDonald 2017) also follows these principles, takes new data on magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) into account and reintroduces the role of cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) diagnostics for relapsing-remitting forms. The main priority is a reliable diagnosis as early as possible with the aim of a timely initiation of course-adapted treatment. Some of the concrete innovations are the consideration of cortical MRI lesions (equivalent to juxtacortical foci), the elimination of a distinction between asymptomatic and symptomatic MRI lesions and consideration of characteristic CSF findings for the criterion of temporal dissemination. Relapsing MS can be diagnosed at the time of the first attack by the detection of CSF-specific oligoclonal bands and the MRI detection of a typical local lesion distribution (even without simultaneous detection of a contrast-enhancing lesion). For the primary progressive course, for which a first treatment option has recently been approved, the known definition remains unaltered. With respect to the differential diagnosis there is a clear demarcation from Devic's syndrome, now known as neuromyelitis optica spectrum disorders (NMOSD), as recent insights indicate a separate disease entity caused by an autoimmune response against the astrocytic aquaporin 4 (AQP4) water channel. Finally, future studies will have to provide a definition for secondary progressive MS courses and clarify how to handle diseases characterized by antibodies against myelin oligodendrocyte glycoprotein (MOG) or patients with radiologically isolated syndrome (RIS), i. e. incidental MRI-based detection of CNS lesions in the absence of any clinical event. In summary, McDonald 2017 is within the conceptual structure of its predecessor and simplifies an early diagnosis, thus paving the way to early treatment of MS.

Indexed as

Multiple SclerosisAquaporin 4Diagnosis, DifferentialHumansMagnetic Resonance ImagingMyelin-Oligodendrocyte GlycoproteinNeuromyelitis OpticaAquaporin 4Myelin-Oligodendrocyte GlycoproteinCerebrospinal fluid diagnosticsClinically isolated syndromeMagnetic resonance imagingNeuromyelitis optica spectrum disordersTreatment

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.