Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29876581›Full record

ArticleSocial psychiatry and psychiatric epidemiology2018

Who is seeking whom? A person-centred approach to help-seeking in adults with currently untreated mental health problems via latent class analysis.

S Tomczyk, G Schomerus, S Stolzenburg, H Muehlan, S Schmidt

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Social psychiatry and psychiatric epidemiology, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
14citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

14 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Observational
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. "Who Are at Higher Sexual Risk?" Latent Class Analysis of Behavioral Intentions among Spanish Adolescents.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2021
    Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

S TomczykDepartment Health and Prevention, Institute of Psychology, University of Greifswald, Robert-Blum-Straße 13, 17487, Greifswald, Germany. samuel.tomczyk@uni-greifswald.de.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-2846-5489
G SchomerusDepartment of Psychiatry, University Medicine Greifswald, Ellernholzstraße 1-2, 17475, Greifswald, Germany.
S StolzenburgDepartment of Psychiatry, University Medicine Greifswald, Ellernholzstraße 1-2, 17475, Greifswald, Germany.
H MuehlanDepartment Health and Prevention, Institute of Psychology, University of Greifswald, Robert-Blum-Straße 13, 17487, Greifswald, Germany.
S SchmidtDepartment Health and Prevention, Institute of Psychology, University of Greifswald, Robert-Blum-Straße 13, 17487, Greifswald, Germany.

Funding

Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft SCHM 2683/4-1Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft SCHO 1337/4-1
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeGlobal surveys point to a gap in mental health service utilisation. However, contacting more than one source of professional help may influence the estimates of utilisation. Currently, few studies statistically differentiate between different sources of help based on patient characteristics.

methodsWe assessed sociodemographic and psychosocial data in a convenience sample of 188 adults with mental health problems (M

resultsWe found four latent classes: "mental health professionals" (MHP; 9.0%), "multiple sources" (4.3%), "primary care" (35.6%), and "non-seekers" (51.1%). All classes had moderate to high probabilities of seeking help from friends or family. Primary care utilisers were more often in a cohabiting partnership; MHP utilisers were more experienced in mental health treatment and reported lower well-being and more depressive symptoms than non-seekers. By trend, non-seekers were younger, and both non-seekers and primary care utilisers reported fewer depressive and somatic symptoms than utilisers of multiple sources and MHP.

conclusionsIn our analysis, MHP utilisation was even lower (9.0%) than in previous studies. However, MHP utilisers appeared to suffer from more serious conditions than other latent classes. As informal sources such as family and friends were present in all latent classes, help-seeking behaviour seems to transcend traditional MHP-focused approaches. Further research is necessary to investigate tenability and trajectories of different latent classes of help-seeking in larger and representative samples with longer follow-ups.

Indexed as

Health Services AccessibilityLatent Class AnalysisPatient-Centered CareAdolescentAdultAgedAged, 80 and overDepressionFemaleFriendsHumansMaleMental DisordersMental HealthMental Health ServicesMiddle AgedCommunity mental healthDepressionHealth service researchMental healthPsychiatric services

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.