Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29876305›Full record

ReviewBiotechnology reports (Amsterdam, Netherlands)2018

Biotechnological aspects of plants metabolites in the treatment of ulcer: A new prospective.

Amit Kishore Singh, Sandeep Kumar Singh, Prem Pratap Singh, Akhileshwar Kumar Srivastava, Kapil D Pandey, Ajay Kumar, Himanshu Yadav

Open access · goldAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Biotechnology reports (Amsterdam, Netherlands), 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
1.1field-weighted citation impact, top 26% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 40 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Antioxidant and Gastroprotective Activity ofMolecules (Basel, Switzerland) · 2022
    Article
  6. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Amit Kishore SinghCenter of Advanced Study in Botany, Institute of Science, Banaras Hindu University, Varanasi, India.
Sandeep Kumar SinghCenter of Advanced Study in Botany, Institute of Science, Banaras Hindu University, Varanasi, India.
Prem Pratap SinghCenter of Advanced Study in Botany, Institute of Science, Banaras Hindu University, Varanasi, India.
Akhileshwar Kumar SrivastavaCenter of Advanced Study in Botany, Institute of Science, Banaras Hindu University, Varanasi, India.
Kapil D PandeyCenter of Advanced Study in Botany, Institute of Science, Banaras Hindu University, Varanasi, India.
Ajay KumarCenter of Advanced Study in Botany, Institute of Science, Banaras Hindu University, Varanasi, India.
Himanshu YadavCenter of Advanced Study in Zoology, Institute of Science, Banaras Hindu University, Varanasi, India.
Banaras Hindu University · IN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Ulcer is one of the most common diseases affecting throughout the world population. The allopathic treatment of ulcer adversely affects the health by causing harmful side effects. Currently, many herbal plants and secondary metabolites have been used for the ulcer treatment. In the present review, many herbal plants and their parts (root, rhizome, bark, leaves and fruits) have been listed in the table are currently being used for ulcer treatment. These metabolites are responsible for ulcer-neutralization or anti-inflammatory properties. In silico study, plant metabolites showed interaction between protodioscin (secondary metabolites of

Indexed as

DrugsMedicinal plantsMolecular dockingSecondary metabolitesUlcer

Identifiers

PMID29876305
PMCPMC5989591
OpenAlexW2801958005

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.