Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29876283›Full record

ArticleNeuroImage. Clinical2018

Object-action dissociation: A voxel-based lesion-symptom mapping study on 102 patients after glioma removal.

Alberto Pisoni, Giulia Mattavelli, Alessandra Casarotti, Alessandro Comi, Marco Riva, Lorenzo Bello, Costanza Papagno

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in NeuroImage. Clinical, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Neural network bases of thematic semantic processing in language production.Cortex; a journal devoted to the study of the nervous system and behavior · 2022
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. A new test of action verb naming: normative data from 290 Italian adults.Neurological sciences : official journal of the Italian Neurological Society and of the Italian Society of Clinical Neurophysiology · 2020
    Article
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Alberto PisoniDipartimento di Psicologia, University of Milano-Bicocca, Piazza dell'Ateneo Nuovo 1, Milano 20126, Italy; NeuroMi (Neuroscience Center), University of Milano-Bicocca, Italy.
Giulia MattavelliDipartimento di Psicologia, University of Milano-Bicocca, Piazza dell'Ateneo Nuovo 1, Milano 20126, Italy; NeuroMi (Neuroscience Center), University of Milano-Bicocca, Italy.
Alessandra CasarottiUnit of Oncological Neurosurgery, Humanitas Research Hospital, via Manzoni 56, Italy.
Alessandro ComiDipartimento di Psicologia, University of Milano-Bicocca, Piazza dell'Ateneo Nuovo 1, Milano 20126, Italy.
Marco RivaUnit of Oncological Neurosurgery, Humanitas Research Hospital, via Manzoni 56, Italy.
Lorenzo BelloUnit of Oncological Neurosurgery, Humanitas Research Hospital, via Manzoni 56, Italy; Department of Oncology and Hemato-Oncology, Università degli Studi di Milano, via Festa del Perdono 7, Milano 20122, Italy.
Costanza PapagnoDipartimento di Psicologia, University of Milano-Bicocca, Piazza dell'Ateneo Nuovo 1, Milano 20126, Italy; CIMeC, CeRiN, via Matteo del Ben 5/b, University of Trento and Rovereto, Rovereto 38068, Italy. Electronic address: costanza.papagno@unimib.it.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Data concerning the neural basis of noun and verb processing are inconsistent. Some authors assume that action-verb processing is based on frontal areas while nouns processing relies on temporal regions; others argue that the circuits processing verbs and nouns are closely interconnected in a predominantly left-lateralized fronto-temporal-parietal network; yet, other researchers consider that the primary motor cortex plays a crucial role in processing action verbs. In the present study, one hundred and two patients with a tumour either in the right or left hemisphere were submitted to picture naming of objects and actions before and after surgery. To test the effect of specific brain regions in object and action naming, patients' lesions were mapped and voxel-lesion-symptom mapping (VLSM) was computed. Behavioural results showed that left-brain damaged patients were significantly more impaired than right brain-damaged patients. The VLSM showed that these two grammatical classes are segregated in the left hemisphere. In particular, scores in naming of objects correlated with damage to the anterior temporal region, while scores in naming of actions correlated with lesions in the parietal areas and in the posterior temporal cortex. In addition, VLSM analyses carried out on non-linguistic tasks were not significant, confirming that the regions associated with deficits in object and action naming were not generally engaged in all cognitive tasks. Finally, the involvement of subcortical pathways was investigated and the inferior longitudinal fasciculus proved to play a role in object naming, while no specific bundle was identified for actions.

Indexed as

AdolescentAdultAgedBrainBrain InjuriesBrain MappingFemaleFunctional LateralityGliomaHumansMaleMiddle AgedNerve NetNeuropsychological TestsYoung AdultFrontal lesionObject action dissociationTemporal lesionVoxel-based lesion symptom mapping

Identifiers

PMID29876283
PMCPMC5988029

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.