ArticleNeuroImage. Clinical2018
Unification of behavioural, computational and neural accounts of word production errors in post-stroke aphasia.
Article in NeuroImage. Clinical, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
13 citing papers in PubMed, 31 citations in OpenAlex.
- The neural correlates of novel versus familiar metaphors in healthy young adults: A functional near-infrared spectroscopy study.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2025Article
- Brain Areas Critical for Picture Naming: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Lesion-Symptom Mapping Studies.Neurobiology of language (Cambridge, Mass.) · 2023Article
- Neural regions underlying object and action naming: Complementary evidence from acute stroke and primary progressive aphasia.Aphasiology · 2022Article
- Using word-picture verification to inform language impairment locus in chronic post-stroke aphasia.Frontiers in rehabilitation sciences · 2022Article
- Common predictors of spoken and written language performance in aphasia, alexia, and agraphia.Frontiers in human neuroscience · 2022Article
- Predicting language recovery in post-stroke aphasia using behavior and functional MRI.Scientific reports · 2021Article
- Connections and selections: Comparing multivariate predictions and parameter associations from latent variable models of picture naming.Cognitive neuropsychology · 2021Article
- Facilitating Word Retrieval in Aphasia: Which Type of Cues for Which Aphasic Speakers?Frontiers in human neuroscience · 2021Article
- Graded, multidimensional intra- and intergroup variations in primary progressive aphasia and post-stroke aphasia.Brain : a journal of neurology · 2020Article
- Investigating the effect of changing parameters when building prediction models for post-stroke aphasia.Nature human behaviour · 2020Article
- Post-stroke cognitive deficits rarely come alone: Handling co-morbidity in lesion-behaviour mapping.Human brain mapping · 2020Article
- Types of naming errors in chronic post-stroke aphasia are dissociated by dual stream axonal loss.Scientific reports · 2018Article
- A Metabolic Imaging Study of Lexical and Phonological Naming Errors in Alzheimer Disease.American journal of Alzheimer's disease and other dementiasArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.
Funding
Abstract
Neuropsychological assessment, brain imaging and computational modelling have augmented our understanding of the multifaceted functional deficits in people with language disorders after stroke. Despite the volume of research using each technique, no studies have attempted to assimilate all three approaches in order to generate a unified behavioural-computational-neural model of post-stroke aphasia. The present study included data from 53 participants with chronic post-stroke aphasia and merged: aphasiological profiles based on a detailed neuropsychological assessment battery which was analysed with principal component and correlational analyses; measures of the impairment taken from Dell's computational model of word production; and the neural correlates of both behavioural and computational accounts analysed by voxel-based correlational methodology. As a result, all three strands coincide with the separation of semantic and phonological stages of aphasic naming, revealing the prominence of these dimensions for the explanation of aphasic performance. Over and above three previously described principal components (phonological ability, semantic ability, executive-demand), we observed auditory working memory as a novel factor. While the phonological Dell parameter was uniquely related to phonological errors/factor, the semantic parameter was less clear-cut, being related to both semantic errors and omissions, and loading heavily with semantic ability and auditory working memory factors. The close relationship between the semantic Dell parameter and omission errors recurred in their high lesion-correlate overlap in the anterior middle temporal gyrus. In addition, the simultaneous overlap of the lesion correlate of omission errors with more dorsal temporal regions, associated with the phonological parameter, highlights the multiple drivers that underpin this error type. The novel auditory working memory factor was located along left superior/middle temporal gyrus and ventral inferior parietal lobe. The present study fused computational, behavioural and neural data to gain comprehensive insights into the nature of the multifaceted presentations in aphasia. Our unified account contributes enhanced knowledge on dimensions explaining chronic post-stroke aphasia, the variety of factors affecting inter-individual variability, the neural basis of performance, and potential clinical implications.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.