ArticleNeuroImage. Clinical2018
Dyscalculia and dyslexia: Different behavioral, yet similar brain activity profiles during arithmetic.
Article in NeuroImage. Clinical, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 26 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
26 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 86 citations in OpenAlex.
- Examination of common and unique brain regions for atypical reading and math: a meta-analysis.Cerebral cortex (New York, N.Y. : 1991) · 2023Pooled it
- Effectiveness of social-emotional learning program on psychological distress and dysregulation in students with specific learning disorders.BMC psychology · 2025Trial
- Neurocognitive mechanisms of co-occurring math difficulties in dyslexia: Differences in executive function and visuospatial processing.Developmental science · 2024Article
- White matter and literacy: A dynamic system in flux.Developmental cognitive neuroscience · 2024Article
- Activation and functional connectivity of cerebellum during reading and during arithmetic in children with combined reading and math disabilities.Frontiers in neuroscience · 2024Article
- From brain to education through machine learning: Predicting literacy and numeracy skills from neuroimaging data.Imaging neuroscience (Cambridge, Mass.) · 2024Article
- Developmental dyscalculia is not associated with atypical brain activation: A univariate fMRI study of arithmetic, magnitude processing, and visuospatial working memory.Human brain mapping · 2023Article
- What Components of Working Memory Are Impaired in Children with Reading and/or Mathematics Difficulties?Children (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023Article
- The ReadFree tool for the identification of poor readers: a validation study based on a machine learning approach in monolingual and minority-language children.Annals of dyslexia · 2023Article
- Dyslexia: Causes and Concomitant Impairments.Brain sciences · 2023Review
- Changes in the superior longitudinal fasciculus and anterior thalamic radiation in the left brain are associated with developmental dyscalculia.Frontiers in human neuroscience · 2023Article
- A-B-3-Associations and dissociations of reading and arithmetic: Is domain-specific prediction outdated?PloS one · 2023Article
- Supporting students with sex chromosome aneuploidies in educational settings: Results of a nationwide survey.Journal of school psychology · 2022Article
- Impaired Arithmetic Fact Retrieval in an Adult with Developmental Dyscalculia: Evidence from Behavioral and Functional Brain Imaging Data.Brain sciences · 2022Article
- Cognitive style and working memory among adolescents with specific learning disability.Journal of education and health promotion · 2022Article
- Is Developmental Dyslexia Due to a Visual and Not a Phonological Impairment?Brain sciences · 2021Review
- The Polygenic Nature and Complex Genetic Architecture of Specific Learning Disorder.Brain sciences · 2021Review
- How to capture developmental brain dynamics: gaps and solutions.NPJ science of learning · 2021Article
- Acquisition of Mathematical and Linguistic Skills in Children With Learning Difficulties.Frontiers in psychology · 2021Article
- Editorial: Interpreting the Comorbidity of Learning Disorders.Frontiers in human neuroscience · 2021Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.
Funding
Abstract
Brain disorders are often investigated in isolation, but very different conclusions might be reached when studies directly contrast multiple disorders. Here, we illustrate this in the context of specific learning disorders, such as dyscalculia and dyslexia. While children with dyscalculia show deficits in arithmetic, children with dyslexia present with reading difficulties. Furthermore, the comorbidity between dyslexia and dyscalculia is surprisingly high. Different hypotheses have been proposed on the origin of these disorders (number processing deficits in dyscalculia, phonological deficits in dyslexia) but these have never been directly contrasted in one brain imaging study. Therefore, we compared the brain activity of children with dyslexia, children with dyscalculia, children with comorbid dyslexia/dyscalculia and healthy controls during arithmetic in a design that allowed us to disentangle various processes that might be associated with the specific or common neural origins of these learning disorders. Participants were 62 children aged 9 to 12, 39 of whom had been clinically diagnosed with a specific learning disorder (dyscalculia and/or dyslexia). All children underwent fMRI scanning while performing an arithmetic task in different formats (dot arrays, digits and number words). At the behavioral level, children with dyscalculia showed lower accuracy when subtracting dot arrays, and all children with learning disorders were slower in responding compared to typically developing children (especially in symbolic formats). However, at the neural level, analyses pointed towards substantial neural similarity between children with learning disorders: Control children demonstrated higher activation levels in frontal and parietal areas than the three groups of children with learning disorders, regardless of the disorder. A direct comparison between the groups of children with learning disorders revealed similar levels of neural activation throughout the brain across these groups. Multivariate subject generalization analyses were used to statistically test the degree of similarity, and confirmed that the neural activation patterns of children with dyslexia, dyscalculia and dyslexia/dyscalculia were highly similar in how they deviated from neural activation patterns in control children. Collectively, these results suggest that, despite differences at the behavioral level, the brain activity profiles of children with different learning disorders during arithmetic may be more similar than initially thought.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.