Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29876137›Full record

ArticleNature reviews. Materials2017

Towards clinically translatable

Seung-Min Park, Amin Aalipour, Ophir Vermesh, Jung Ho Yu, Sanjiv S Gambhir

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Nature reviews. Materials, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 103 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
103citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

103 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Bypassing Heteronuclear MRI: Metal-Free Organosilicon Nanotracers for Background-Free HotspotAdvanced science (Weinheim, Baden-Wurttemberg, Germany) · 2026
    Article
  3. Review
  4. The role of exosomal long non-coding RNAs in head, neck and thyroid cancers.Medical oncology (Northwood, London, England) · 2025
    Review
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Advances in Nano-Immunomodulatory Systems for the Treatment of Acute Kidney Injury.Advanced science (Weinheim, Baden-Wurttemberg, Germany) · 2025
    Review
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Review
  12. Review
  13. Mobile Diagnostic Clinics.ACS sensors · 2024
    Review
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Review
  19. Review
  20. Review

43 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Seung-Min ParkDepartment of Radiology, Stanford University School of Medicine.
Amin AalipourDepartment of Radiology, Stanford University School of Medicine.
Ophir VermeshDepartment of Radiology, Stanford University School of Medicine.
Jung Ho YuDepartment of Radiology, Stanford University School of Medicine.
Sanjiv S GambhirDepartment of Radiology, Stanford University School of Medicine.

Funding

Pilot ProjectsU54CA151459 · NCI · STANFORD UNIVERSITY · PI GAMBHIR, SANJIV S · 2010 to 2014
$12.6M
NCI NIH HHS U54 CA151459
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Nanodiagnostics as a field makes use of fundamental advances in nanobiotechnology to diagnose, characterize and manage disease at the molecular scale. As these strategies move closer to routine clinical use, a proper understanding of different imaging modalities, relevant biological systems and physical properties governing nanoscale interactions is necessary to rationally engineer next-generation bionanomaterials. In this Review, we analyse the background physics of several clinically relevant imaging modalities and their associated sensitivity and specificity, provide an overview of the materials currently used for

Indexed as

Physical sciences / Engineering / Biomedical engineering [URI /639/166/985]Physical sciences / Materials science / Nanoscale materials [URI /639/301/357]Physical sciences / Nanoscience and technology / Nanomedicine [URI /639/925/352]Physical sciences / Nanoscience and technology / Nanoscale materials [URI /639/925/357]

Identifiers

PMID29876137
PMCPMC5985817

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.