ArticleEcology and evolution2018
Development of high transferability cpSSR markers for individual identification and genetic investigation in Cupressaceae species.
Article in Ecology and evolution, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 16 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
16 citing papers in PubMed.
- Chloroplast Genome Characterization, Comparative Analysis, and Phylogenetic Insights into FiveInternational journal of molecular sciences · 2026Article
- Application and development prospect of genomic selection breeding in coniferous trees.Planta · 2025Review
- Comparative Analysis ofGenes · 2025Article
- Harnessing chloroplast SSRs to decipher genetic diversity in underutilizedFrontiers in plant science · 2025Article
- Assessing population genetic structure and diversity and their driving factors in Phoebe zhennan populations.BMC plant biology · 2024Article
- Comparative plastomes sheds light on phylogeny ofFrontiers in plant science · 2024Article
- Development of Chloroplast Microsatellite Markers and Evaluation of Genetic Diversity and Population Structure of Cutleaf Groundcherry (Plants (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023Article
- Comparative analysis of the medicinal plantFrontiers in plant science · 2023Article
- Insights into chloroplast genome structure and phylogenetic relationships within theFrontiers in genetics · 2023Article
- Complete Plastome ofGenes · 2022Article
- The Complete Chloroplast Genome Sequence ofGenes · 2022Article
- Development and Characterization of Microsatellite Markers Based on the Chloroplast Genome of Tree Peony.Genes · 2022Article
- Article
- Molecular markers from the chloroplast genome of rose provide a complementary tool for variety discrimination and profiling.Scientific reports · 2020Article
- Initial Characterization of the Chloroplast Genome ofFrontiers in genetics · 2020Article
- Development of high transferability cpSSR markers for individual identification and genetic investigation in Cupressaceae species.Ecology and evolution · 2018Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Given the low substitution rate in plastomes, the polymorphic and codominant nature of chloroplast SSRs (cpSSRs) makes them ideal markers, complementing their nuclear counterpart. In Cupressaceae, cpSSRs are mostly paternally inherited, thus, they are useful in mating systems and pollen flow studies. Using e-PCR, 92 SSR loci were identified across six Cupressaceae plastomes, and primers were designed for 26 loci with potential interspecific transferability. The 26 developed cpSSRs were polymorphic in four genera,
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.