Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29876002›Full record

ArticleOncotarget2018

Evaluation of appropriate follow-up after curative surgery for patients with colorectal cancer using time to recurrence and survival after recurrence: a retrospective multicenter study.

Tomoki Yamano, Shinichi Yamauchi, Kiyoshi Tsukamoto, Masafumi Noda, Masayoshi Kobayashi, Michiko Hamanaka, Akihito Babaya, Kei Kimura, Chihyon Son, Ayako Imada and 5 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Oncotarget, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Recurrence and Postoperative Death in Patients with Colorectal Cancer: A New Perspective via Semi-competing Risk Framework.The Turkish journal of gastroenterology : the official journal of Turkish Society of Gastroenterology · 2023
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

15 authors.

Tomoki YamanoDivision of Lower GI Surgery, Department of Surgery, Hyogo College of Medicine, Hyogo, Japan.
Shinichi YamauchiDivision of Colorectal Surgery, Department of Surgery, Tokyo Medical and Dental University, Tokyo, Japan.
Kiyoshi TsukamotoDivision of Lower GI Surgery, Department of Surgery, Hyogo College of Medicine, Hyogo, Japan.
Masafumi NodaDivision of Lower GI Surgery, Department of Surgery, Hyogo College of Medicine, Hyogo, Japan.
Masayoshi KobayashiDivision of Lower GI Surgery, Department of Surgery, Hyogo College of Medicine, Hyogo, Japan.
Michiko HamanakaDivision of Lower GI Surgery, Department of Surgery, Hyogo College of Medicine, Hyogo, Japan.
Akihito BabayaDivision of Lower GI Surgery, Department of Surgery, Hyogo College of Medicine, Hyogo, Japan.
Kei KimuraDivision of Lower GI Surgery, Department of Surgery, Hyogo College of Medicine, Hyogo, Japan.
Chihyon SonDivision of Lower GI Surgery, Department of Surgery, Hyogo College of Medicine, Hyogo, Japan.
Ayako ImadaDivision of Lower GI Surgery, Department of Surgery, Hyogo College of Medicine, Hyogo, Japan.
Shino TanakaDivision of Lower GI Surgery, Department of Surgery, Hyogo College of Medicine, Hyogo, Japan.
Masataka IkedaDivision of Lower GI Surgery, Department of Surgery, Hyogo College of Medicine, Hyogo, Japan.
Naohiro TomitaDivision of Lower GI Surgery, Department of Surgery, Hyogo College of Medicine, Hyogo, Japan.
Kenichi SugiharaDivision of Colorectal Surgery, Department of Surgery, Tokyo Medical and Dental University, Tokyo, Japan.
Japanese Study Group for Postoperative Follow-up of Colorectal Cancer

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionThe follow-up schedule for colorectal cancer patients after curative surgery is inconsistent among the guidelines. Evaluation of time to recurrence (TTR) and survival after recurrence (SAR) may provide evidence for appropriate follow-up.

methodsWe assessed 3039 colon cancer (CC) and 1953 rectal cancer (RC) patients who underwent curative surgery between 2007 and 2008. We evaluated the pre- and post-recurrent clinicopathological factors associated with TTR and SAR in each stage of CC and RC.

resultsThe recurrence rates of stages I, II, and III were 1.2%, 13.1%, and 26.3%, respectively, for CC, and 8.4%, 20.0%, and 30.4%, respectively, for RC. In CC patients, high carcinoembryonic antigen (CEA) level and lymphovascular invasion were independent predictors of short TTR. In RC patients, metastatic factors (liver metastasis in stage III) and venous invasion (stage III) were independent predictors of short TTR. The prognostic factors of SAR were age (stage II CC and stage III RC), female gender (stage III RC), high CEA level (stage II RC), histological type (stage III CRC), nodal status (stage III CC), recurrence within 1 year (stage III RC), M1b recurrence (stage II CRC), local recurrence (stage II CC), and no surgical resection after recurrence (stage II and III CRC).

conclusionsThe follow-up schedule for stage I should be different from that for the other stages. We recommend that intensive follow-up is appropriate in stage III CC patients with undifferentiated adenocarcinoma or N2 nodal status, stage II RC patients with high preoperative CEA level, and stage III RC patients.

Indexed as

colorectal cancercurative surgeryfollow-uprecurrencesurvival

Identifiers

PMID29876002
PMCPMC5986641

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.