ArticleThe Pan African medical journal2018
[Outcomes of laparoscopic surgery for groin hernia repair: our experience in Tunisia].
Article in The Pan African medical journal, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 5 citations in OpenAlex.
- Safety and effectiveness of laparoscopic adult groin hernia repair in Africa: a systematic review and meta-analysis.Hernia : the journal of hernias and abdominal wall surgery · 2024Pooled it
- Robotic and Laparoscopic Inguinal Hernia Repair in Africa: Current Adoption, Challenges, and Future Horizons.Journal of abdominal wall surgery : JAWS · 2026Review
- Extraperitoneal Laparoscopic Approach in Inguinal Hernia-The Ideal Solution?Journal of clinical medicine · 2022Article
- Improving surgical education in East Africa with a standardized hernia training program.Hernia : the journal of hernias and abdominal wall surgery · 2021Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Groin hernia in adults is a frequent affection in digestive surgery. Many repair techniques have been described to date, including laparoscopic surgery. Two methods are quickly adopted by the various practitioners for the surgical treatment of groin hernia using laparoscopy: laparoscopic totally extra-peritoneal (TEP) technique and laparoscopic transperitoneal inguinal hernia repair (TAPP). This study focused on the feasibility of groin hernia repair using coelioscopy, aiming to describe its outcomes in terms of recurrence and postoperative pain. We conducted a single-center, retrospective and cross-sectional study of patients who had undergone laparoscopic surgery for groin hernia repair in the Department of Surgery at La Rabta Hospital over a period of 8 years, from January 2006 to December 2013. The main evaluation criterion was hernia recurrence. Postoperative pain and complications were the secondary criteria of judgment. We collected data from 92 patients with 104 hernias, respecting the inclusion criteria in our study. The average age of patients was 48 years (19-83). TAPP was the most used technique: 94 TAPP (90%) versus 10 TEP. No intraoperative complication was reported. Conversion rate was 0. Operative mortality was also 0. Postoperative morbidity was 5% (5 patients). It included hematoma in 3 cases and serum in 2 cases. The mean lenght of stay in hospital was 1.2 days (1-4 days). Postoperative length of stay didn't exceed 2 days in 94% of patients. Only 2 patients had a recurrence. Postoperative chronic pain was reported only in 3 patients. Our study shows that laparoscopic surgery for groin hernia repair gives considerable comfort to our patients with regard to pain, length of stay in hospital and cessation of work. Outcomes are good and consistent with the results already published in the literature. This encourages surgeons to use these techniques and to monitor longer term outcomes.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.