Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29875817›Full record

ArticleEvolutionary applications2018

Reproductive suppression, birth defects, and periviable birth.

Ralph Catalano, Tim A Bruckner, Deborah Karasek, Wei Yang, Gary M Shaw

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Evolutionary applications, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
1.0field-weighted citation impact, top 17% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed, 6 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Cohort SelectionCancer epidemiology, biomarkers & prevention : a publication of the American Association for Cancer Research, cosponsored by the American Society of Preventive Oncology · 2021
    Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Ralph CatalanoSchool of Public Health University of California Berkeley CA USA.ORCID 0000-0001-7240-415X
Tim A BrucknerProgram in Public Health University of California Irvine CA USA.ORCID 0000-0002-6927-964X
Deborah KarasekSchool of Public Health University of California Berkeley CA USA.ORCID 0000-0002-5909-5441
Wei YangDepartment of Pediatrics Division of Neonatology Stanford University School of Medicine Stanford CA USA.ORCID 0000-0003-4613-7523
Gary M ShawDepartment of Pediatrics Division of Neonatology Stanford University School of Medicine Stanford CA USA.ORCID 0000-0001-7438-4914
Berkeley Public Health Division · USStanford Medicine · USUniversity of California, Irvine · US

Funding

ACL HHS U01DD001033NCBDD CDC HHS U01 DD001033
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

We argue that reproductive suppression has clinical implications beyond its contribution to the burden of spontaneous abortion. We theorize that the incidence of births before the 28th week of gestation, which contribute disproportionately to infant morbidity and mortality, varies over time in part due to reproductive suppression in the form of selection in utero. We further theorize that the prevalence of structural birth defects among survivors to birth from conception cohorts gauges selection in utero. We based these theories on literature positing that natural selection conserved mechanisms that spontaneously abort "risky" pregnancies including those otherwise likely to yield infants with structural birth defects or small-for-gestational age males. We test our theory using high-quality birth defect surveillance data. We identify 479,885 male infants exposed to strong selection defined as membership in conception cohorts ranked in the lowest quartile of odds of a birth defect among live-born females. We estimate the risk of periviable birth among these infants as a function of selective pressure as well as of mother's race/ethnicity and age. We find that male infants from exposed conception cohorts exhibited 10% lower odds of periviable birth than males from other conception cohorts. Our findings support the argument that selection in utero has implications beyond its contribution to the burden of spontaneous abortion.

Indexed as

birth defectsperiviable birthreproductive suppression

Identifiers

PMID29875817
PMCPMC5979761
OpenAlexW2772373419

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.