Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29875809›Full record

ArticleEvolutionary applications2018

Widespread, long-term admixture between grey wolves and domestic dogs across Eurasia and its implications for the conservation status of hybrids.

Małgorzata Pilot, Claudia Greco, Bridgett M vonHoldt, Ettore Randi, Włodzimierz Jędrzejewski, Vadim E Sidorovich, Maciej K Konopiński, Elaine A Ostrander, Robert K Wayne

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Evolutionary applications, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 39 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
39citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
10.3field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

39 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 103 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Mating system of free-ranging domestic dogs and its consequences for dog evolution.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2025
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Introgression-Friend or Foe?Molecular ecology · 2025
    Article
  8. Simulating the efficacy of wolf-dog hybridization management with individual-based modeling.Conservation biology : the journal of the Society for Conservation Biology · 2025
    Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Scientists' warning on genetic pollution.Discover conservation · 2025
    Review
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Anthropogenic Change and the Process of Speciation.Cold Spring Harbor perspectives in biology · 2023
    Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 8 institutions in 6 countries.

Małgorzata PilotSchool of Life Sciences University of Lincoln Lincoln UK.ORCID 0000-0002-6057-5768
Claudia GrecoDepartment of Environmental Monitoring and Biodiversity Conservation Italian National Institute for Environmental Protection and Research Bologna Italy.
Bridgett M vonHoldtDepartment of Ecology and Evolutionary Biology Princeton University Princeton NJ USA.
Ettore RandiDepartment of Environmental Monitoring and Biodiversity Conservation Italian National Institute for Environmental Protection and Research Bologna Italy.
Włodzimierz JędrzejewskiMammal Research Institute Polish Academy of Sciences Białowieża Poland.
Vadim E SidorovichInstitute of Zoology National Academy of Sciences of Belarus Minsk Belarus.
Maciej K KonopińskiInstitute of Nature Conservation Polish Academy of Sciences Kraków Poland.
Elaine A OstranderCancer Genetics and Comparative Genomics Branch National Human Genome Research Institute National Institutes of Health Bethesda MD USA.
Robert K WayneDepartment of Ecology and Evolutionary Biology University of California Los Angeles CA USA.
Institute of Environmental Protection · PLInstitute of Nature Conservation · PLMammal Research Institute · PLNational Academy of Sciences of Belarus · BYNational Institutes of Health · USPrinceton University · USUniversity of California, Los Angeles · USUniversity of Lincoln · GB

Funding

Comparative Mammalian GenomicsZIAHG200377 · NHGRI · NATIONAL HUMAN GENOME RESEARCH INSTITUTE · PI OSTRANDER, ELAINE · 2012 to 2025
$24.8M
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Hybridisation between a domesticated species and its wild ancestor is an important conservation problem, especially if it results in the introgression of domestic gene variants into wild species. Nevertheless, the legal status of hybrids remains unregulated, partially because of the limited understanding of the hybridisation process and its consequences. The occurrence of hybridisation between grey wolves and domestic dogs is well documented from different parts of the wolf geographic range, but little is known about the frequency of hybridisation events, their causes and the genetic impact on wolf populations. We analysed 61K SNPs spanning the canid genome in wolves from across Eurasia and North America and compared that data to similar data from dogs to identify signatures of admixture. The haplotype block analysis, which included 38 autosomes and the X chromosome, indicated the presence of individuals of mixed wolf-dog ancestry in most Eurasian wolf populations, but less admixture was present in North American populations. We found evidence for male-biased introgression of dog alleles into wolf populations, but also identified a first-generation hybrid resulting from mating between a female dog and a male wolf. We found small blocks of dog ancestry in the genomes of 62% Eurasian wolves studied and melanistic individuals with no signs of recent admixed ancestry, but with a dog-derived allele at a locus linked to melanism. Consequently, these results suggest that hybridisation has been occurring in different parts of Eurasia on multiple timescales and is not solely a recent phenomenon. Nevertheless, wolf populations have maintained genetic differentiation from dogs, suggesting that hybridisation at a low frequency does not diminish distinctiveness of the wolf gene pool. However, increased hybridisation frequency may be detrimental for wolf populations, stressing the need for genetic monitoring to assess the frequency and distribution of individuals resulting from recent admixture.

Indexed as

admixed ancestrydomestic doggene introgressiongrey wolfhybridisation

Identifiers

PMID29875809
PMCPMC5978975
OpenAlexW2782919048

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.