Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29875803›Full record

ArticleEvolutionary applications2018

A physiological perspective on fisheries-induced evolution.

Jack Hollins, Davide Thambithurai, Barbara Koeck, Amelie Crespel, David M Bailey, Steven J Cooke, Jan Lindström, Kevin J Parsons, Shaun S Killen

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Evolutionary applications, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 30 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
30citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

30 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Phenotypic divergence of sand flathead (Conservation physiology · 2026
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Environmental forcing alters fisheries selection.Trends in ecology & evolution · 2024
    Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Genomic basis of fishing-associated selection varies with population density.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2021
    Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Jack HollinsInstitute of Biodiversity, Animal Health and Comparative Medicine University of Glasgow Glasgow UK.
Davide ThambithuraiInstitute of Biodiversity, Animal Health and Comparative Medicine University of Glasgow Glasgow UK.ORCID 0000-0002-0338-3778
Barbara KoeckInstitute of Biodiversity, Animal Health and Comparative Medicine University of Glasgow Glasgow UK.ORCID 0000-0001-7142-364X
Amelie CrespelInstitute of Biodiversity, Animal Health and Comparative Medicine University of Glasgow Glasgow UK.
David M BaileyInstitute of Biodiversity, Animal Health and Comparative Medicine University of Glasgow Glasgow UK.
Steven J CookeFish Ecology and Conservation Physiology Laboratory Department of Biology and Institute of Environmental Science Carleton University Ottawa ON Canada.
Jan LindströmInstitute of Biodiversity, Animal Health and Comparative Medicine University of Glasgow Glasgow UK.
Kevin J ParsonsInstitute of Biodiversity, Animal Health and Comparative Medicine University of Glasgow Glasgow UK.
Shaun S KillenInstitute of Biodiversity, Animal Health and Comparative Medicine University of Glasgow Glasgow UK.ORCID 0000-0003-4949-3988

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

There is increasing evidence that intense fishing pressure is not only depleting fish stocks but also causing evolutionary changes to fish populations. In particular, body size and fecundity in wild fish populations may be altered in response to the high and often size-selective mortality exerted by fisheries. While these effects can have serious consequences for the viability of fish populations, there are also a range of traits not directly related to body size which could also affect susceptibility to capture by fishing gears-and therefore fisheries-induced evolution (FIE)-but which have to date been ignored. For example, overlooked within the context of FIE is the likelihood that variation in physiological traits could make some individuals within species more vulnerable to capture. Specifically, traits related to energy balance (e.g., metabolic rate), swimming performance (e.g., aerobic scope), neuroendocrinology (e.g., stress responsiveness) and sensory physiology (e.g., visual acuity) are especially likely to influence vulnerability to capture through a variety of mechanisms. Selection on these traits could produce major shifts in the physiological traits within populations in response to fishing pressure that are yet to be considered but which could influence population resource requirements, resilience, species' distributions and responses to environmental change.

Indexed as

anthropogenic changeecophysiologyfishingharvest‐induced selectionmetabolic rate

Identifiers

PMID29875803
PMCPMC5978952

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.