Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29875765›Full record

ReviewFrontiers in immunology2018

Autophagy and Its Interaction With Intracellular Bacterial Pathogens.

Mariana da Silva Siqueira, Renato de Moraes Ribeiro, Leonardo H Travassos

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Frontiers in immunology, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 65 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
65citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

65 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. mBio · 2025
    Article
  8. Autophagy reports · 2025
    Article
  9. Review
  10. Review
  11. Apoptosis and autophagy promoteFrontiers in microbiology · 2025
    Article
  12. Review
  13. Review
  14. Review
  15. Review
  16. Interplay between group AMicrobiology and molecular biology reviews : MMBR · 2024
    Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Article

5 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Mariana da Silva SiqueiraLaboratory of Immunoreceptors and Signaling, Immunobiology Program, Institute of Biophysics Carlos Chagas Filho, Federal University of Rio de Janeiro, Rio de Janeiro, Brazil.
Renato de Moraes RibeiroLaboratory of Immunoreceptors and Signaling, Immunobiology Program, Institute of Biophysics Carlos Chagas Filho, Federal University of Rio de Janeiro, Rio de Janeiro, Brazil.
Leonardo H TravassosLaboratory of Immunoreceptors and Signaling, Immunobiology Program, Institute of Biophysics Carlos Chagas Filho, Federal University of Rio de Janeiro, Rio de Janeiro, Brazil.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Cellular responses to stress can be defined by the overwhelming number of changes that cells go through upon contact with and stressful conditions such as infection and modifications in nutritional status. One of the main cellular responses to stress is autophagy. Much progress has been made in the understanding of the mechanisms involved in the induction of autophagy during infection by intracellular bacteria. This review aims to discuss recent findings on the role of autophagy as a cellular response to intracellular bacterial pathogens such as,

Indexed as

AutophagyBacterial Physiological PhenomenaHost-Pathogen InteractionsAmino AcidsAMP-Activated Protein KinasesAnimalsAutophagosomesBacterial InfectionsBiological TransportBiomarkersHumansIntracellular SpaceSignal TransductionAmino AcidsAMP-Activated Protein KinasesBiomarkersautophagyinfectionLegionella pneumophilaListeria monocytogenesMycobacterium tuberculosisSalmonella typhimuriumShigella flexneriStreptococcus pyogenes

Identifiers

PMID29875765
PMCPMC5974045

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.