Editorial: Family Interventions in Psychosis Change Outcomes in Early Intervention Settings - How Much Does the Evidence Support This?

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

1. Who Gets FIp? Understanding Contextual Factors in EIP Provision.Early intervention in psychiatry · 2026
   Article
2. "Never Just the Next Case File": A Qualitative Study Exploring Youth and Family Experiences Within Early Psychosis Coordinated Specialty Care.Early intervention in psychiatry · 2026
   Article
3. Urgency for Digital Technologies to Support Caregivers. Comment on "Telehealth-Based Psychoeducation for Caregivers: The Family Intervention in Recent-Onset Schizophrenia Treatment Study".JMIR mental health · 2022
   Article
4. Real-world effectiveness of admissions to a tertiary treatment-resistant psychosis service: 2-year mirror-image study.BJPsych open · 2020
   Article

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

Abstract

PubMed holds no abstract for this paper.

Indexed as