Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29875427›Full record

ArticleGenetics in medicine : official journal of the American College of Medical Genetics2019

Implementation, adoption, and utility of family health history risk assessment in diverse care settings: evaluating implementation processes and impact with an implementation framework.

R Ryanne Wu, Rachel A Myers, Nina Sperber, Corrine I Voils, Joan Neuner, Catherine A McCarty, Irina V Haller, Melissa Harry, Kimberly G Fulda, Deanna Cross and 5 more

Abstract readEvaluation Study
In one paragraph

Article in Genetics in medicine : official journal of the American College of Medical Genetics, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 23 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
23citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

23 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Genetically guided precision medicine clinical decision support tools: a systematic review.Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association : JAMIA · 2024
    Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Trial
  4. Article
  5. Observational
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

15 authors.

R Ryanne WuCenter for Applied Genomics and Precision Medicine, Department of Medicine, Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, North Carolina, USA. Ryanne.wu@duke.edu.
Rachel A MyersCenter for Applied Genomics and Precision Medicine, Department of Medicine, Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, North Carolina, USA.
Nina SperberCenter for Applied Genomics and Precision Medicine, Department of Medicine, Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, North Carolina, USA.
Corrine I VoilsWilliam S. Middleton Memorial Veterans Hospital, Madison, Wisconsin, USA.
Joan NeunerDepartment of Medicine, Medical College of Wisconsin, Milwaukee, Wisconsin, USA.
Catherine A McCartyUniversity of Minnesota Medical School, Duluth campus, Minneapolis, Minnesota, USA.
Irina V HallerEssentia Institute of Rural Health, Duluth, Minnesota, USA.
Melissa HarryEssentia Institute of Rural Health, Duluth, Minnesota, USA.
Kimberly G FuldaThe North Texas Primary care Practice-Based Research Network and Family Medicine, University of North Texas Health Science Center, Fort Worth, Texas, USA.
Deanna CrossGraduate School of Biomedical Sciences, University of North Texas Health Science Center, Fort Worth, Texas, USA.
David DimmockRady Children's Institute for Genomic Medicine, Encinitas, California, USA.
Teji Rakhra-BurrisCenter for Applied Genomics and Precision Medicine, Department of Medicine, Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, North Carolina, USA.
Adam H BuchananGenomic Medicine Institute, Geisinger, Danville, Pennsylvania, USA.
Geoffrey S GinsburgCenter for Applied Genomics and Precision Medicine, Department of Medicine, Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, North Carolina, USA.
Lori A OrlandoCenter for Applied Genomics and Precision Medicine, Department of Medicine, Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, North Carolina, USA.

Funding

Implementation, Adoption, and Utility of Family History in Diverse Care SettingsU01HG007282 · NHGRI · DUKE UNIVERSITY · PI GINSBURG, GEOFFREY S, ORLANDO, LORI ANN · 2013 to 2018
$7.0M
NHGRI NIH HHS U01 HG007282VA RCS 14-443
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeThis paper describes the implementation outcomes associated with integrating a family health history-based risk assessment and clinical decision support platform within primary care clinics at four diverse healthcare systems.

methodsA type III hybrid implementation-effectiveness trial. Uptake and implementation processes were evaluated using the Reach, Effectiveness, Adoption, Implementation, and Maintenance (RE-AIM) framework.

resultsOne hundred (58%) primary care providers and 2514 (7.8%) adult patients enrolled. Enrolled patients were 69% female, 22% minority, and 32% Medicare/Medicaid. Compared with their respective clinic's population, patient-participants were more likely to be female (69 vs. 59%), older (mean age 57 vs. 49), and Caucasian (88 vs. 69%) (all p values <0.001). Female (81.3% of females vs. 78.5% of males, p value = 0.018) and Caucasian (Caucasians 90.4% vs. minority 84.1%, p value = 0.02) patient-participants were more likely to complete the study once enrolled. Patient-participant survey responses indicated MeTree was easy to use (95%), and patient-participants would recommend it to family/friends (91%). Minorities and those with less education reported greatest benefit. Enrolled providers reflected demographics of underlying provider population.

conclusionFamily health history-based risk assessment can be effectively implemented in diverse primary care settings and can effectively engage patients and providers. Future research should focus on finding better ways to engage young adults, males, and minorities in preventive healthcare.

Indexed as

Decision Support Systems, ClinicalMedical History TakingRisk AssessmentSoftwareAdultFemaleHumansInternetMaleMiddle AgedPrimary Health CareFamily historyImplementationPopulation healthRisk assessment

Identifiers

PMID29875427
PMCPMC6281814

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.