Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29875305›Full record

ArticleProceedings. Biological sciences2018

True recognition of nestlings by hosts selects for mimetic cuckoo chicks.

Hee-Jin Noh, Ros Gloag, Naomi E Langmore

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Proceedings. Biological sciences, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
15citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

15 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. How to learn to recognize conspecific brood parasitic offspring.Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences · 2020
    Article
  13. Evolutionarily stable investments in recognition systems explain patterns of discrimination failure and success.Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences · 2020
    Article
  14. Parasitic cuckoo catfish exploit parental responses to stray offspring.Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences · 2019
    Article
  15. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Hee-Jin NohResearch School of Biology, Australian National University, RN Robertson Building, 46 Sullivans Creek Road, Canberra, Australian Capital Territory 2601, Australia heejin.noh@anu.edu.au.ORCID 0000-0003-4937-9093
Ros GloagSchool of Life and Environmental Sciences, University of Sydney, Macleay Building A12, Science Road, Sydney, New South Wales 2006, Australia.ORCID 0000-0002-2037-4267
Naomi E LangmoreResearch School of Biology, Australian National University, RN Robertson Building, 46 Sullivans Creek Road, Canberra, Australian Capital Territory 2601, Australia.ORCID 0000-0003-3368-6697

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Brood parasitic cuckoos lay their eggs in other birds' nests, whereafter the young cuckoo hatches, ejects its nest-mates and monopolizes the care of the host parents. Theory predicts that hosts should not evolve to recognize and reject cuckoo chicks via imprinting because of the risk of mistakenly imprinting on a cuckoo chick in their first brood and thereafter always rejecting their own chicks. However, recent studies have revealed that some hosts do reject cuckoo chicks from the nest, indicating that these hosts' recognition systems either do not rely on first brood imprinting, or use cues that are independent of chick phenotype. Here, we investigate the proximate mechanisms of chick rejection behaviour in the large-billed gerygone (

Indexed as

Biological EvolutionHost-Parasite InteractionsNesting BehaviorRecognition, PsychologyVisual PerceptionAnimalsBirdsQueenslandSongbirdsbronze-cuckoobrood parasitismchick discriminationchick rejectiongerygonehost defence

Identifiers

PMID29875305
PMCPMC6015857

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.