Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29875302›Full record

ArticleProceedings. Biological sciences2018

Toxicity and taste: unequal chemical defences in a mimicry ring.

Anne E Winters, Nerida G Wilson, Cedric P van den Berg, Martin J How, John A Endler, N Justin Marshall, Andrew M White, Mary J Garson, Karen L Cheney

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Proceedings. Biological sciences, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 17 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
17citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

17 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Weak warning signals can persist in the absence of gene flow.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2019
    Article
  15. Article
  16. Highly defended nudibranchs "escape" to visually distinct background habitats.Behavioral ecology : official journal of the International Society for Behavioral Ecology
    Article
  17. Defense against predators incurs high reproductive costs for the aposematic mothBehavioral ecology : official journal of the International Society for Behavioral Ecology
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Anne E WintersSchool of Biological Sciences, The University of Queensland, Brisbane, Queensland 4072, Australia.ORCID 0000-0003-2840-6267
Nerida G WilsonMolecular Systematics Unit, Western Australian Museum, 49 Kew St, Welshpool, Western Australia 6106, Australia.ORCID 0000-0002-0784-0200
Cedric P van den BergSchool of Biological Sciences, The University of Queensland, Brisbane, Queensland 4072, Australia.ORCID 0000-0001-6422-7237
Martin J HowSchool of Biological Sciences, University of Bristol, Bristol BS8 1TQ, UK.ORCID 0000-0001-5135-8828
John A EndlerCentre for Integrative Ecology, School of Life and Environmental Science, Deakin University, Geelong, Victoria 3216, Australia.ORCID 0000-0002-7557-7627
N Justin MarshallQueensland Brain Institute, The University of Queensland, Brisbane, Queensland 4072, Australia.ORCID 0000-0001-9006-6713
Andrew M WhiteSchool of Chemistry and Molecular Biosciences, The University of Queensland, Brisbane, Queensland 4072, Australia.ORCID 0000-0002-9481-1079
Mary J GarsonSchool of Chemistry and Molecular Biosciences, The University of Queensland, Brisbane, Queensland 4072, Australia.ORCID 0000-0001-8670-1075
Karen L CheneySchool of Biological Sciences, The University of Queensland, Brisbane, Queensland 4072, Australia k.cheney@uq.edu.au.ORCID 0000-0001-5622-9494

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Mimicry of warning signals is common, and can be mutualistic when mimetic species harbour equal levels of defence (Müllerian), or parasitic when mimics are undefended but still gain protection from their resemblance to the model (Batesian). However, whether chemically defended mimics should be similar in terms of toxicity (i.e. causing damage to the consumer) and/or unpalatability (i.e. distasteful to consumer) is unclear and in many studies remains undifferentiated. In this study, we investigated the evolution of visual signals and chemical defences in a putative mimicry ring of nudibranch molluscs. First, we demonstrated that the appearance of a group of red spotted nudibranchs molluscs was similar from the perspective of potential fish predators using visual modelling and pattern analysis. Second, using phylogenetic reconstruction, we demonstrated that this colour pattern has evolved multiple times in distantly related individuals. Third, we showed that these nudibranchs contained different chemical profiles used for defensive purposes. Finally, we demonstrated that although levels of distastefulness towards Palaemon shrimp remained relatively constant between species, toxicity levels towards brine shrimp varied significantly. We highlight the need to disentangle toxicity and taste when considering chemical defences in aposematic and mimetic species, and discuss the implications for aposematic and mimicry signal evolution.

Indexed as

Biological EvolutionBiological MimicryFood ChainAnimalsAustraliaColorGastropodaPalaemonidaePhylogenyTasteTetraodontiformesaposematismchemical defencesmarine invertebratesmimicry ringsnudibranch

Identifiers

PMID29875302
PMCPMC6015865

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.