Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29875206›Full record

ArticleBiology letters2018

Mathieu Giraudeau, Ann-Kathrin Ziegler, Kevin J Mcgraw, Monika Okuliarová, Michal Zeman, Barbara Tschirren

Open access · greenAbstract read
PubMed Full text at PMC Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Biology letters, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact, top 97% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed, 0 citations in OpenAlex.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 4 institutions in 5 countries.

Mathieu GiraudeauSchool of Life Sciences, Arizona State University, Tempe, AZ 85287-4501, USA giraudeau.mathieu@gmail.com.ORCID 0000-0001-8563-1810
Ann-Kathrin ZieglerDepartment of Evolutionary Biology and Environmental Studies, University of Zurich, Winterthurerstrasse 190, 8057 Switzerland.
Kevin J McgrawSchool of Life Sciences, Arizona State University, Tempe, AZ 85287-4501, USA.
Monika OkuliarováDepartment of Animal Physiology and Ethology, Faculty of Natural Sciences, Comenius University in Bratislava, Ilkovičova 6, 842 15, Bratislava, Slovakia.
Michal ZemanDepartment of Animal Physiology and Ethology, Faculty of Natural Sciences, Comenius University in Bratislava, Ilkovičova 6, 842 15, Bratislava, Slovakia.
Barbara TschirrenCentre for Ecology and Conservation, University of Exeter, Penryn, Cornwall TR10 9FE, UK.ORCID 0000-0003-4806-4102
Comenius University Bratislava · SKUniversity of Zurich · CHArizona State University · USLund University · SE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Mothers can influence prenatal conditions by varying the amount of nutrients, hormones or antioxidants they provide to their developing young. Some of these substances even affect the transfer of these compounds in the next generation, but it is less clear how different maternally transmitted compounds interact with each other to shape reproductive resource allocation in their offspring. Here, we found that female Japanese quails (

Indexed as

AnimalsAntioxidantsCarotenoidsCoturnixEgg YolkEmbryo, NonmammalianFemaleLuteinOvumTestosteroneAntioxidantsCarotenoidsLuteinTestosteroneegg compositionmaternal effectsparental careprenatal conditionsyolk carotenoidsyolk testosterone

Identifiers

PMID29875206
PMCPMC6030601
OpenAlexW2803593197

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.