Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29875156›Full record

ArticleGlobal health, science and practice2018

Design, Implementation, and Evaluation of a School Insecticide-Treated Net Distribution Program in Cross River State, Nigeria.

Angela Acosta, Emmanuel Obi, Richmond Ato Selby, Iyam Ugot, Matthew Lynch, Mark Maire, Kassahun Belay, Abidemi Okechukwu, Uwem Inyang, Jessica Kafuko and 5 more

Open access · diamondAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Global health, science and practice, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
2.9field-weighted citation impact, top 9% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 13 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Observational
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. A Study of Childhood Malaria trends at the University of Port Harcourt Teaching Hospital: 2006 - 2018.Nigerian medical journal : journal of the Nigeria Medical Association
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

15 authors at 6 institutions in 2 countries.

Angela AcostaJohns Hopkins Center for Communication Programs, Baltimore, MD, USA. angela.acosta@jhu.edu.
Emmanuel ObiTropical Health, LLP, Montagut, Spain.
Richmond Ato SelbyJohns Hopkins Center for Communication Programs, Baltimore, MD, USA.
Iyam UgotOffice of the Governor, Cross River State, Nigeria.
Matthew LynchJohns Hopkins Center for Communication Programs, Baltimore, MD, USA.
Mark MaireDivision of Parasitic Diseases and Malaria, Center for Global Health, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, GA, USA.
Kassahun BelayU.S. President's Malaria Initiative, U.S. Agency for International Development, Abuja, Nigeria.
Abidemi OkechukwuU.S. President's Malaria Initiative, U.S. Agency for International Development, Abuja, Nigeria.
Uwem InyangU.S. President's Malaria Initiative, U.S. Agency for International Development, Abuja, Nigeria.
Jessica KafukoU.S. President's Malaria Initiative, U.S. Agency for International Development, Abuja, Nigeria.
George GreerU.S. President's Malaria Initiative, U.S. Agency for International Development, Dar es Salaam, Tanzania.
Lilia GerbergU.S. President's Malaria Initiative, U.S. Agency for International Development, Bureau for Global Health, Office of Health, Infectious Disease & Nutrition, Washington, DC, USA.
Megan FotheringhamU.S. President's Malaria Initiative, U.S. Agency for International Development, Bureau for Global Health, Office of Health, Infectious Disease & Nutrition, Washington, DC, USA.
Hannah KoenkerJohns Hopkins Center for Communication Programs, Baltimore, MD, USA.
Albert KilianTropical Health, LLP, Montagut, Spain.
U.S. President's Malaria Initiative · USCenters for Disease Control and Prevention · USJohns Hopkins Center for Communication Programs · USJohns Hopkins University · USMalaria Consortium · UGOffice of the Governor · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundIn 2013, the World Health Organization recommended distribution through schools, health facilities, community health workers, and mass campaigns to maintain coverage with insecticide-treated nets (ITNs). We piloted school distribution in 3 local government areas (LGAs) of Cross River State, Nigeria.

methodsFrom January to March 2011, all 3 study sites participated in a mass ITN campaign. Baseline data were collected in June 2012 (N=753 households) and school distribution began afterward. One ITN per student was distributed to 4 grades once a year in public schools. Obubra LGA distributed ITNs in 2012, 2013, and 2014 and Ogoja LGA in 2013 and 2014 while Ikom LGA served as a comparison site. Pregnant women in all sites were eligible to receive ITNs through standard antenatal care (ANC). Endline survey data (N=1,450 households) were collected in March 2014. Data on ITN ownership, population access to an ITN, and ITN use were gathered and analyzed. Statistical analysis used contingency tables and chi-squared tests for univariate analysis, and a concentration index was calculated to assess equity in ITN ownership.

resultsBetween baseline and endline, household ownership of at least 1 ITN increased in the intervention sites, from 50% (95% confidence interval [CI]: 44.7, 54.3) to 76% (95% CI: 71.2, 81.0) in Ogoja and from 51% (95% CI: 35.3, 66.7) to 78% (95% CI: 71.5, 83.1) in Obubra, as did population access to ITN, from 36% (95% CI: 32.0, 39.5) to 53% (95% CI: 48.0, 58.0) in Ogoja and from 34% (95% CI: 23.2, 45.6) to 55% in Obubra (95% CI: 48.4, 60.9). In contrast, ITN ownership declined in the comparison site, from 64% (95% CI: 56.4, 70.8) to 43% (95% CI: 37.4, 49.4), as did population ITN access, from 47% (95% CI: 40.0, 53.7) to 26% (95% CI: 21.9, 29.9). Ownership of school ITNs was nearly as equitable (concentration index 0.06 [95% CI: 0.02, 0.11]) as for campaign ITNs (-0.03 [95% CI: -0.08, 0.02]), and there was no significant oversupply or undersupply among households with ITNs. Schools were the most common source of ITNs at endline and very few households (<2%) had nets from both school and ANC.

conclusionITN distribution through schools and ANC provide complementary reach and can play an effective role in achieving and maintaining universal coverage. More research is needed to evaluate the cost-effectiveness of such continuous distribution channels in combination with, or as a potential replacement for, subsequent mass campaigns.

Indexed as

Insecticide-Treated BednetsSchoolsAdultChild, PreschoolFemaleHealth PromotionHumansInfantMalariaNigeriaPilot ProjectsPregnancyProgram DevelopmentProgram EvaluationSurveys and Questionnaires

Identifiers

PMID29875156
PMCPMC6024633
OpenAlexW2806294931

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.