Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29875043›Full record

ReviewCanadian Urological Association journal = Journal de l'Association des urologues du Canada2018

Management of chronic scrotal content pain.

Christopher Wu, Keith Jarvi

Registry-linked trialAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Canadian Urological Association journal = Journal de l'Association des urologues du Canada, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT05112081 (Evaluation of Botox Treatment in Patients With Chronic Scrotal Pain), which is not on this map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT05112081 phase4unknown statusnot on this mapstarted 2022, after this paper: background citation

Evaluation of Botox Treatment in Patients With Chronic Scrotal Pain: a Randomized Double Blinded Control Trial

TypeinterventionalSponsorNicolai Skov SchiellerupRan2022 to 2026Enrolled50ConditionsScrotum Disease, Chronic PainArmsBotulinum toxin type A, Sterile saline
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Gold Standard Care of Chronic Scrotal Pain.Research and reports in urology · 2021
    Review
  4. Review
  5. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Christopher WuDivision of Urology, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON.
Keith JarviDivision of Urology, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

PubMed holds no abstract for this paper.

Identifiers

PMID29875043
PMCPMC6040612

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.