ArticleTurkish journal of urology2018
Delayed diagnosis of primary vesicoureteral reflux in children with recurrent urinary tract infections: Diagnostic approach and renal outcomes.
Article in Turkish journal of urology, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed, 9 citations in OpenAlex.
- Reply to Surve K.Pediatric radiology · 2026Article
- Abnormal DMSA renal scan findings and associated factors in older children with vesicoureteral reflux.International urology and nephrology · 2021Article
- Clinical manifestations, laboratory markers, and renal ultrasonographic examinations in 1-month to 12-year-old Iranian children with pyelonephritis: a six-year cross-sectional retrospective study.BMC infectious diseases · 2021Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectiveIn this study, we aimed to assess renal outcomes of delayed diagnosis of dilating primary vesicoureteral reflux (VUR) following recurrent febrile urinary tract infections (fUTIs) and its diagnostic imaging procedures. MATERIAL AND
methodsThe medical records of patients who underwent ultrasonography (US), non- acute dimercaptosuccinic acid (Tc-99mDMSA) scintigraphy and voiding cystourethrography (VCUG), and who were older than 2 years at the time of VUR diagnosis were retrospectively reviewed.
resultsA total of 32 children (female, n=27: 84.4%) with a mean age of 7.67±3.34 years at the time of diagnosis of VUR were included in the study. Grade III, IV, V VUR were found in 22%, 69%, and 9% of the patients, respectively. At the time of VUR diagnosis, abnormal US findings were detected in 75% of the cases. Tc-99mDMSA detected abnormalities in 83.9% (7 with a single scar, 7 with multiple lesions, 12 with reduced kidney function) of the patients. Estimated glomerular filtration rate of 3 patients with bilateral grade IV VUR was <75 mL/min/1.73 m
conclusionVCUG should be performed routinely in addition to US and non-acute DMSA in all children referred with recurrent fUTIs. Awareness of childhood UTI in public and healthcare personnels should be increased in order to refer these patients at a early stage to pediatric urology and nephrology units.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.