Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29874943›Full record

ReviewExpert opinion on biological therapy2018

Methods for improving the immunogenicity and efficacy of cancer vaccines.

Lorenzo Pilla, Soldano Ferrone, Cristina Maccalli

Open access · greenAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Expert opinion on biological therapy, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
14citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
0.9field-weighted citation impact, top 28% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

14 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 23 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Advances in nucleic acid-based cancer vaccines.Journal of biomedical science · 2025
    Review
  5. Unlocking cancer vaccine potential: What are the key factors?Human vaccines & immunotherapeutics · 2024
    Review
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Using PAMPs and DAMPs as adjuvants in cancer vaccines.Human vaccines & immunotherapeutics · 2021
    Review
  11. Review
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Lorenzo Pillaa Medical Oncology Unit , San Gerardo Hospital , Monza , Italy.
Soldano Ferroneb Department of Surgery , Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Medical School , Boston , MA , USA.
Cristina Maccallic Clinical Research Center, Division of Translational Medicine , Sidra Medicine , Doha , Qatar.ORCID 0000-0002-6737-4715
Azienda Ospedaliera San Gerardo · ITHarvard University · US

Funding

T cell plasticity, fusion proteins and CAR T cell-based immunotherapy of head and neck cancerR01DE028172 · NIDCR · MASSACHUSETTS GENERAL HOSPITAL · PI WANG, XINHUI · 2018 to 2022
$1.9M
IL-15 TRiKES-based specific immunotherapy of pancreatic ductal adenocarcinomaR03CA231766 · NCI · MASSACHUSETTS GENERAL HOSPITAL · PI FERRONE, CRISTINA R., FERRONE, SOLDANO · 2018 to 2019
$177k
IL-15 TRiKES-based specific immunotherapy of TNBC; resistance mechanismsR03CA216114 · NCI · MASSACHUSETTS GENERAL HOSPITAL · PI FERRONE, SOLDANO, VALLERA, DANIEL A · 2018 to 2019
$177k
Safety and anti-tumor activity of B7-H3 CAR T cells in TNBCR03CA223886 · NCI · MASSACHUSETTS GENERAL HOSPITAL · PI DOTTI, GIANPIETRO, FERRONE, SOLDANO · 2018 to 2019
$176k
NCI NIH HHS R03 CA216114NCI NIH HHS R03 CA223886NCI NIH HHS R03 CA231766NIDCR NIH HHS R01 DE028172
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionCancer vaccines represent one of the oldest immunotherapy strategies. A variety of tumor-associated antigens have been exploited to investigate their immunogenicity as well as multiple strategies for vaccine administration. These efforts have led to the development of several clinical trials in tumors with different histological origins to test the clinical efficacy of cancer vaccines. However, suboptimal clinical results have been reported mainly due to the lack of optimized strategies to induce strong and sustained systemic tumor antigen-specific immune responses. AREAS COVERED: We provide an overview of different types of cancer vaccines that have been developed and used in the context of clinical studies. Moreover, we review different preclinical and clinical strategies pursued to enhance the immunogenicity, stability, and targeting at tumor site of cancer vaccines. EXPERT OPINION: Additional and appropriate preclinical studies are warranted to optimize the immunogenicity and delivery of cancer vaccines. The appropriate choice of target antigens is challenging; however, the exploitation of neoantigens generated from somatic mutations of tumor cells represents a promising approach to target highly immunogenic tumor-specific antigens. Remarkably, the investigation of the combination of cancer vaccines with immunomodulating agents able to skew the tumor microenvironment from immunosuppressive to immunostimulating will dramatically improve their clinical efficacy.

Indexed as

AnimalsAntigens, NeoplasmCancer VaccinesHumansImmunogenicity, VaccineImmunotherapyNeoplasmsTreatment OutcomeTumor MicroenvironmentAntigens, NeoplasmCancer VaccinesCancer vaccinescombination studiesimmunogenicityimmunomodulating agentsneoantigenstumor-associated antigens

Identifiers

PMID29874943
PMCPMC8670419
OpenAlexW2806855831

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.