ArticleClinical endoscopy2018
Revision of Quality Indicators for the Endoscopy Quality Improvement Program of the National Cancer Screening Program in Korea.
Article in Clinical endoscopy, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 27 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
27 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 35 citations in OpenAlex.
- Test performance metrics for breast, cervical, colon, and lung cancer screening: a systematic review.Journal of the National Cancer Institute · 2023Pooled it
- AI-assisted improvement of endoscopic diagnosis of ampullary lesions.NPJ digital medicine · 2026Article
- Toward a New Gold Standard: Defining Quality in Gastric Cancer Screening.Gut and liver · 2026Article
- Diagnostic Performance and Potential Harms of Population-Based Esophagogastroduodenoscopy for Gastric Cancer Screening.Gut and liver · 2026Article
- Colonoscopy Quality and Strategies for Improvement.Gut and liver · 2026Review
- Adenoma per polypectomy as a training metric in colonoscopy: a retrospective analysis of trainee progression compared to expert performance.Annals of surgical treatment and research · 2025Article
- GastroHUN an Endoscopy Dataset of Complete Systematic Screening Protocol for the Stomach.Scientific data · 2025Article
- Association of Intensive Endoscopic Burden with Esophageal Cancer Detection: A Nationwide Cohort Study.Gut and liver · 2025Article
- Improving image-retrieval performance of foundation models in gastrointestinal endoscopic images.Frontiers in medicine · 2025Article
- Association between Endoscopist Volume and Interval Cancers after Colonoscopy: Results from the National Colorectal Cancer Screening Program in Korea.Cancer research and treatment · 2024Article
- Performance of the National Cancer Screening Program for Gastric Cancer in Korea.The Korean journal of helicobacter and upper gastrointestinal research · 2024Review
- Review
- Simulator-based training method in gastrointestinal endoscopy training and currently available simulators.Clinical endoscopy · 2023Review
- Korean Guidelines for Postpolypectomy Colonoscopic Surveillance: 2022 revised edition.Intestinal research · 2023Review
- [Current Endoscopy Training in Korea and Future Aspects].The Korean journal of gastroenterology = Taehan Sohwagi Hakhoe chi · 2022Review
- Korean guidelines for postpolypectomy colonoscopic surveillance: 2022 revised edition.Clinical endoscopy · 2022Review
- [Korean Guidelines for Postpolypectomy Colonoscopic Surveillance: 2022 Revised Edition].The Korean journal of gastroenterology = Taehan Sohwagi Hakhoe chi · 2022Review
- The Influence of Face Shields on the Quality of Colonoscopy in the Era of the COVID-19 Pandemic.Gut and liver · 2022Article
- Quality indicators in esophagogastroduodenoscopy.Clinical endoscopy · 2022Review
- A scoping review on population-centered indicators for cancer care continuum.Frontiers in public health · 2022Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors at 8 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Gastroscopy and colonoscopy are widely used for the early diagnosis of stomach and colorectal cancer. The present revision integrates recent data regarding previous quality indicators and novel indicators suggested for gastroscopy and colonoscopy procedures for the National Cancer Screening Program in Korea. The new indicators, developed by the Quality Improvement Committee of the Korean Society for Gastrointestinal Endoscopy, vary in the level of supporting evidence, and most are based solely on expert opinion. Updated indicators validated by clinical research were prioritized, but were chosen by expert consensus when such studies were absent. The resultant quality indicators were graded according to the levels of consensus and recommendations. The updated indicators will provide a relevant guideline for high-quality endoscopy. The future direction of quality indicator development should include relevant outcome measures and an evidence-based approach to support proposed performance targets.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.