ReviewGenes2018
Synthesis of Biomaterials Utilizing Microfluidic Technology.
Review in Genes, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
11 citing papers in PubMed.
- Microfluidic-Based Whole-Cell Biosensor Systems-Challenges and Future Applications.Biosensors · 2026Review
- Targeting tie-2 receptor with rebastinib (DCC-2036) for angiogenesis Inhibition in early-stage arthritis : enhanced efficacy through liposomal sustained release.Inflammopharmacology · 2026Article
- Correction to "Nanofibrous Microspheres: A Biomimetic Platform for Bone Tissue Regeneration".ACS applied bio materials · 2024Article
- Recent Advances in Polymer Science and Fabrication Processes for Enhanced Microfluidic Applications: An Overview.Micromachines · 2024Review
- Nanofibrous Microspheres: A Biomimetic Platform for Bone Tissue Regeneration.ACS applied bio materials · 2024Review
- Selective expansion of target cells using the Enrich TROVO platform.BioTechniques · 2023Article
- Lipid-Based Drug Delivery Systems for Diseases Managements.Biomedicines · 2022Review
- Fast Electrochemical Actuator with Ti Electrodes in the Current Stabilization Regime.Micromachines · 2022Article
- Biofabrication of natural hydrogels for cardiac, neural, and bone Tissue engineering Applications.Bioactive materials · 2021Review
- Microfluidics for the rapid detection ofBioengineered · 2020Article
- Development of Artificial Cell Models Using Microfluidic Technology and Synthetic Biology.Micromachines · 2020Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Recently, microfluidic technologies have attracted an enormous amount of interest as potential new tools for a large range of applications including materials synthesis, chemical and biological detection, drug delivery and screening, point-of-care diagnostics, and in-the-field analysis. Their ability to handle extremely small volumes of fluids is accompanied by additional benefits, most notably, rapid and efficient mass and heat transfer. In addition, reactions performed within microfluidic systems are highly controlled, meaning that many advanced materials, with uniform and bespoke properties, can be synthesized in a direct and rapid manner. In this review, we discuss the utility of microfluidic systems in the synthesis of materials for a variety of biological applications. Such materials include microparticles or microcapsules for drug delivery, nanoscale materials for medicine or cellular assays, and micro- or nanofibers for tissue engineering.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.