Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29874622›Full record

ArticleBiophysical journal2018

Collective Cell Behavior in Mechanosensing of Substrate Thickness.

Camelia G Tusan, Yu-Hin Man, Hoda Zarkoob, David A Johnston, Orestis G Andriotis, Philipp J Thurner, Shoufeng Yang, Edward A Sander, Eileen Gentleman, Bram G Sengers and 1 more

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Biophysical journal, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 26 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
26citing papers in PubMed
2.5field-weighted citation impact, top 11% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

26 citing papers in PubMed, 59 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Emergent depth-mechanosensing of epithelial collectives regulates cell clustering and dispersal on layered matrices.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2025
    Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Engineered hydrogels for mechanobiology.Nature reviews. Methods primers · 2022
    Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors at 5 institutions in 4 countries.

Camelia G TusanCentre for Human Development, Stem Cells and Regeneration, Human Development and Health, Institute of Developmental Sciences, University of Southampton, Southampton, United Kingdom.
Yu-Hin ManCentre for Human Development, Stem Cells and Regeneration, Human Development and Health, Institute of Developmental Sciences, University of Southampton, Southampton, United Kingdom; Mechanical Engineering, University of Southampton, Southampton, United Kingdom.
Hoda ZarkoobDepartment of Biomedical Engineering, College of Engineering, University of Iowa, Iowa City, Iowa.
David A JohnstonBiomedical Imaging Unit, Faculty of Medicine, University of Southampton, Southampton, United Kingdom.
Orestis G AndriotisInstitute of Lightweight Design and Structural Biomechanics, Technische Universität Wien, Vienna, Austria.
Philipp J ThurnerInstitute of Lightweight Design and Structural Biomechanics, Technische Universität Wien, Vienna, Austria.
Shoufeng YangMechanical Engineering, University of Southampton, Southampton, United Kingdom; Department of Mechanical Engineering, Katholieke Universiteit Leuven, Leuven, Belgium.
Edward A SanderDepartment of Biomedical Engineering, College of Engineering, University of Iowa, Iowa City, Iowa.
Eileen GentlemanCentre for Craniofacial and Regenerative Biology, King's College London, London, United Kingdom.
Bram G SengersMechanical Engineering, University of Southampton, Southampton, United Kingdom.
Nicholas D EvansCentre for Human Development, Stem Cells and Regeneration, Human Development and Health, Institute of Developmental Sciences, University of Southampton, Southampton, United Kingdom; Mechanical Engineering, University of Southampton, Southampton, United Kingdom. Electronic address: n.d.evans@soton.ac.uk.
University of Southampton · GBTU Wien · ATUniversity of Iowa · USKing's College London · GBKU Leuven · BE

Funding

Wellcome Trust 093687
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Extracellular matrix stiffness has a profound effect on the behavior of many cell types. Adherent cells apply contractile forces to the material on which they adhere and sense the resistance of the material to deformation-its stiffness. This is dependent on both the elastic modulus and the thickness of the material, with the corollary that single cells are able to sense underlying stiff materials through soft hydrogel materials at low (<10 μm) thicknesses. Here, we hypothesized that cohesive colonies of cells exert more force and create more hydrogel deformation than single cells, therefore enabling them to mechanosense more deeply into underlying materials than single cells. To test this, we modulated the thickness of soft (1 kPa) elastic extracellular-matrix-functionalized polyacrylamide hydrogels adhered to glass substrates and allowed colonies of MG63 cells to form on their surfaces. Cell morphology and deformations of fluorescent fiducial-marker-labeled hydrogels were quantified by time-lapse fluorescence microscopy imaging. Single-cell spreading increased with respect to decreasing hydrogel thickness, with data fitting to an exponential model with half-maximal response at a thickness of 3.2 μm. By quantifying cell area within colonies of defined area, we similarly found that colony-cell spreading increased with decreasing hydrogel thickness but with a greater half-maximal response at 54 μm. Depth-sensing was dependent on Rho-associated protein kinase-mediated cellular contractility. Surface hydrogel deformations were significantly greater on thick hydrogels compared to thin hydrogels. In addition, deformations extended greater distances from the periphery of colonies on thick hydrogels compared to thin hydrogels. Our data suggest that by acting collectively, cells mechanosense rigid materials beneath elastic hydrogels at greater depths than individual cells. This raises the possibility that the collective action of cells in colonies or sheets may allow cells to sense structures of differing material properties at comparatively large distances.

Indexed as

Mechanotransduction, CellularCell Line, TumorElasticityExtracellular MatrixHumansModels, BiologicalPseudopodiarho-Associated KinasesSingle-Cell Analysisrho-Associated Kinases

Identifiers

PMID29874622
PMCPMC6027966
OpenAlexW2953174209

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.