Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29874278›Full record

ArticlePloS one2018

Age-related changes in upper limb motion during typical development.

Cristina Simon-Martinez, Gabriela Lopes Dos Santos, Ellen Jaspers, Ruth Vanderschueren, Lisa Mailleux, Katrijn Klingels, Els Ortibus, Kaat Desloovere, Hilde Feys

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 20 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
20citing papers in PubMed
4.7field-weighted citation impact, top 5% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

20 citing papers in PubMed, 58 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Physical activity in early childhood: a five-year longitudinal analysis of patterns and correlates.The international journal of behavioral nutrition and physical activity · 2022
    Trial
  2. Trial
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 4 institutions in 3 countries.

Cristina Simon-MartinezKU Leuven - University of Leuven, Department of Rehabilitation Sciences, Leuven, Belgium.ORCID 0000-0001-6694-6358
Gabriela Lopes Dos SantosLaboratory of Neurological Physiotherapy Research, Department of Physiotherapy, Federal University of São Carlos (UFSCar), São Carlos, São Paulo, Brazil.
Ellen JaspersKU Leuven - University of Leuven, Department of Rehabilitation Sciences, Leuven, Belgium.
Ruth VanderschuerenKU Leuven - University of Leuven, Department of Rehabilitation Sciences, Leuven, Belgium.
Lisa MailleuxKU Leuven - University of Leuven, Department of Rehabilitation Sciences, Leuven, Belgium.
Katrijn KlingelsKU Leuven - University of Leuven, Department of Rehabilitation Sciences, Leuven, Belgium.
Els OrtibusKU Leuven - University of Leuven, Department of Development and Regeneration, Leuven, Belgium.
Kaat DesloovereKU Leuven - University of Leuven, Department of Rehabilitation Sciences, Leuven, Belgium.
Hilde FeysKU Leuven - University of Leuven, Department of Rehabilitation Sciences, Leuven, Belgium.
KU Leuven · BEETH Zurich · CHHasselt University · BEUniversidade Federal de São Carlos · BR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

BACKGROUND AND

aimUnderstanding the maturation of upper limb (UL) movement characteristics in typically developing (TD) children is key to explore UL deficits in those with neurodevelopmental disorders. Three-dimensional motion analysis (3DMA) offers a reliable tool to comprehensively evaluate UL motion. However, studies thus far mainly focused on specific pre-defined parameters extracted from kinematic waveforms. Here, we investigated age-related differences in UL movement characteristics over the entire movement cycle in TD children. PARTICIPANTS AND

methodsWe assessed the non-dominant UL of 60 TD children (mean age 10y3m±3y1m) using 3DMA during eight tasks: reaching (forwards (RF), upwards (RU), sideways (RS)), reach-to-grasp (sphere (RGS), vertical cylinder (RGV)) and activities-of-daily-living mimicking tasks (hand-to-head (HTH), hand-to-mouth (HTM), hand-to-shoulder (HTS)). We investigated differences between four age-groups (5-7y, 8-10y, 11-12y, 13-15y) in: (1) spatiotemporal parameters (movement duration, peak velocity, time-to-peak velocity and trajectory straightness), and (2) 12 UL joint angles, using Statistical Parametric Mapping (SPM).

resultsWe found that the 5-7y children moved with lower peak velocity and less straight trajectories compared to the 11-12y group (peak velocity: RS, HTS, p<0.01; trajectory: RU, RS, RGV, HTS, p<0.01) and the 13-15y group (peak velocity: RF, RS, RGS, RGV, HTH, HTS, p<0.01; trajectory, all tasks, p<0.01). The 5-7y children showed increased scapular protraction compared to older children (8-10y and 11-12y, HTS), as well as increased scapular medial rotation compared to the 13-15y group (RGS). During RU, the 5-7y children moved more towards the frontal plane (shoulder), unlike the 13-15y group. Lastly, the 5-7y group used less elbow flexion than older children (11-12y and 13-15y) during HTH and HTS. DISCUSSION AND

conclusionIn conclusion, our results point toward a maturation in UL movement characteristics up to age 11-12y, when UL motion seemed to reach a plateau. The reference values provided in this study will help to further optimize the interpretation of UL deficits in children with neurodevelopmental disorders.

Indexed as

AdolescentBiomechanical PhenomenaChildChild, PreschoolFemaleHumansMaleMovementRange of Motion, ArticularSpatio-Temporal AnalysisUpper Extremity

Identifiers

PMID29874278
PMCPMC5991355
OpenAlexW2806791915

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.