Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29874102›Full record

SynthesisChildhood obesity (Print)2018

Executive and Reward-Related Function in Pediatric Obesity: A Meta-Analysis.

Alaina L Pearce, Christine A Leonhardt, Chandan J Vaidya

Abstract readMeta-AnalysisSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Childhood obesity (Print), 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 33 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
33citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

33 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Alaina L Pearce1 Department of Psychology, Georgetown University , Washington, DC.
Christine A Leonhardt1 Department of Psychology, Georgetown University , Washington, DC.
Chandan J Vaidya1 Department of Psychology, Georgetown University , Washington, DC.

Funding

Research_ProjectU54HD090257 · NICHD · CHILDREN'S RESEARCH INSTITUTE · PI LIMPEROPOULOS, CATHERINE · 2016 to 2020
$5.9M
Effect of Bariatric Surgery in Pediatric Obesity on Brain and CognitionR56DK104644 · NIDDK · GEORGETOWN UNIVERSITY · PI MACKEY, ELEANOR RACE, VAIDYA, CHANDAN J · 2015 to 2015
$245k
NICHD NIH HHS U54 HD090257NIDDK NIH HHS R56 DK104644
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveThis study examined the effect of pediatric obesity on executive function and reward-related decision-making, cognitive processes that are relevant to obesogenic behaviors, and evaluated their association with sample (e.g., age, gender, intelligence, and socioeconomic status, SES) and study/task (e.g., categorical/continuous variable, food stimuli) characteristics.

methodsA random-effects meta-analysis was conducted using Hedge's g effect sizes of published studies from 1960 to 2016, limited to children younger than the age of 21 years without medical comorbidities. Analysis included estimation of heterogeneity (τ

resultsAcross 68 studies with 70 samples, obesity was associated with worse functioning overall (-0.24; 95CI: -0.30 to -0.19; p < 0.001) and for each component process (attention, switching, inhibition, interference, working memory, reward, delay of gratification: -0.19 to -0.38; p's < 0.017), except trait impulsivity (-0.06; 95CI: -0.18 to 0.07). Deficits increased with age and female composition of the sample for inhibition (p = 0.002). No other characteristics moderated effect of obesity.

conclusionsSmall-to-moderate negative associations with obesity were observed for executive and reward-related performance, but not on reported impulsivity in studies with children younger than the age of 21 years. These results were not moderated by IQ, SES, and study/task characteristics. Age and gender moderated association with inhibition, with a larger obesity-related deficit in older and predominantly female samples. These results suggest cognitive and demographic intervention targets for prevention and mitigation of obesogenic behavior.

Indexed as

Pediatric ObesityRewardAdolescentAdultAttentionChildChild, PreschoolExecutive FunctionFemaleHumansMaleYoung Adultattentionexecutive functionIQrewardSES

Identifiers

PMID29874102
PMCPMC7141423

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.