ArticleJournal of the National Cancer Institute2018
Development, Validation, and Dissemination of a Breast Cancer Recurrence Detection and Timing Informatics Algorithm.
Article in Journal of the National Cancer Institute, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 39 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
39 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- A Systematic Review of Estimating Breast Cancer Recurrence at the Population Level With Administrative Data.Journal of the National Cancer Institute · 2020Pooled it
- Rule-Based Algorithm to Identify Recurrent Non-Hodgkin Lymphoma in Electronic Health Data.JCO clinical cancer informatics · 2026Article
- External validation of a data-driven algorithm to identify breast cancer recurrences from administrative healthcare data.Breast (Edinburgh, Scotland) · 2026Article
- Risk of late recurrence of colorectal and breast cancer among older long-term cancer survivors.JNCI cancer spectrum · 2026Article
- Diagnostic yield of surveillance mammography among older women.Journal of the National Cancer Institute · 2026Article
- Integrating a Shareable Artificial Intelligence Model Into Clinical Research for Cancer Recurrence in Patients With Breast and Colorectal Cancer.JCO clinical cancer informatics · 2025Article
- Natural language processing for local, regional, and distant breast cancer relapse identification in pathology reports.Breast cancer research and treatment · 2025Article
- Time and location of specialty palliative care for women dying with metastatic breast cancer.Breast cancer research and treatment · 2025Article
- Identification of recurrences in women diagnosed with early invasive breast cancer using routinely collected data in England.BJC reports · 2025Article
- Using Electronic Health Records to Classify Cancer Site and Metastasis.Applied clinical informatics · 2025Article
- Patterns of recurrence among adults diagnosed with screen-detected lung cancer.Cancer epidemiology · 2025Article
- Epidemiology of early vs late recurrence among women with early stage estrogen receptor-positive breast cancer in the Pathways Study.Journal of the National Cancer Institute · 2024Article
- Association of platinum-based chemotherapy with live birth and infertility in female survivors of adolescent and young adult cancer.Fertility and sterility · 2024Article
- Evaluation of machine learning methods for the retrospective detection of ovarian cancer recurrences from chemotherapy data.ESMO real world data and digital oncology · 2024Article
- Development of an Automatic Rule-Based Algorithm for the Detection of Ovarian Cancer Recurrence From Electronic Health Records.JCO clinical cancer informatics · 2024Article
- Evaluation of Algorithms Using Automated Health Plan Data to Identify Breast Cancer Recurrences.Cancer epidemiology, biomarkers & prevention : a publication of the American Association for Cancer Research, cosponsored by the American Society of Preventive Oncology · 2024Article
- Making sense of the risks: what to tell adolescents and young adults diagnosed with cancer during pregnancy.Journal of the National Cancer Institute · 2023Article
- Estimating the incidence of breast cancer recurrence using administrative data.Breast cancer research and treatment · 2023Article
- Real-World Patient Characteristics, Utilization Patterns, and Outcomes of US Patients with HR+, HER2- Metastatic Breast Cancer Treated with Abemaciclib.Drugs - real world outcomes · 2022Article
- Uncertainty in lung cancer stage for survival estimation via set-valued classification.Statistics in medicine · 2022Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Background: This study developed, validated, and disseminated a generalizable informatics algorithm for detecting breast cancer recurrence and timing using a gold standard measure of recurrence coupled with data derived from a readily available common data model that pools health insurance claims and electronic health records data. Methods: The algorithm has two parts: to detect the presence of recurrence and to estimate the timing of recurrence. The primary data source was the Cancer Research Network Virtual Data Warehouse (VDW). Sixteen potential indicators of recurrence were considered for model development. The final recurrence detection and timing models were determined, respectively, by maximizing the area under the ROC curve (AUROC) and minimizing average absolute error. Detection and timing algorithms were validated using VDW data in comparison with a gold standard recurrence capture from a third site in which recurrences were validated through chart review. Performance of this algorithm, stratified by stage at diagnosis, was compared with other published algorithms. All statistical tests were two-sided. Results: Detection model AUROCs were 0.939 (95% confidence interval [CI] = 0.917 to 0.955) in the training data set (n = 3370) and 0.956 (95% CI = 0.944 to 0.971) and 0.900 (95% CI = 0.872 to 0.928), respectively, in the two validation data sets (n = 3370 and 3961, respectively). Timing models yielded average absolute prediction errors of 12.6% (95% CI = 10.5% to 14.5%) in the training data and 11.7% (95% CI = 9.9% to 13.5%) and 10.8% (95% CI = 9.6% to 12.2%) in the validation data sets, respectively, and were statistically significantly lower by 12.6% (95% CI = 8.8% to 16.5%, P < .001) than those estimated using previously reported timing algorithms. Similar covariates were included in both detection and timing algorithms but differed substantially from previous studies. Conclusions: Valid and reliable detection of recurrence using data derived from electronic medical records and insurance claims is feasible. These tools will enable extensive, novel research on quality, effectiveness, and outcomes for breast cancer patients and those who develop recurrence.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.