Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29872953›Full record

ArticleFolia microbiologica2018

Production and cleavage of a fusion protein of porcine trypsinogen and enhanced green fluorescent protein (EGFP) in Pichia pastoris.

Hana Raschmanová, Leona Paulová, Barbora Branská, Zdeněk Knejzlík, Karel Melzoch, Karin Kovar

Open access · greenAbstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Folia microbiologica, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
0.2field-weighted citation impact, top 47% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed, 4 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

Hana RaschmanováDepartment of Biotechnology, University of Chemistry and Technology Prague, Technická 5, 166 28, Prague 6, Czech Republic. hana.raschmanova@vscht.cz.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-3871-081X
Leona PaulováDepartment of Biotechnology, University of Chemistry and Technology Prague, Technická 5, 166 28, Prague 6, Czech Republic.
Barbora BranskáDepartment of Biotechnology, University of Chemistry and Technology Prague, Technická 5, 166 28, Prague 6, Czech Republic.
Zdeněk KnejzlíkDepartment of Biochemistry and Microbiology, University of Chemistry and Technology Prague, Technická 5, 166 28, Prague, Czech Republic.
Karel MelzochDepartment of Biotechnology, University of Chemistry and Technology Prague, Technická 5, 166 28, Prague 6, Czech Republic.
Karin KovarInstitute of Chemistry and Biotechnology, Zurich University of Applied Sciences (ZHAW), Grüentalstrasse 14, 8820, Wädenswil, Switzerland.
University of Chemistry and Technology, Prague · CZZHAW Zurich University of Applied Sciences · CHZHAW Zurich University of Applied Sciences · CH

Funding

Ministerstvo Školství, Mládeže a Tělovýchovy MSM6046137305
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Pharmaceutical grade trypsin is in ever-increasing demand for medical and industrial applications. Improving the efficiency of existing biotechnological manufacturing processes is therefore paramount. When produced biotechnologically, trypsinogen-the inactive precursor of trypsin-is advantageous, since active trypsin would impair cell viability. To study factors affecting cell physiology and the production of trypsinogen in fed-batch cultures, we built a fusion protein of porcine trypsinogen and enhanced green fluorescent protein (EGFP) in Pichia pastoris. The experiments were performed with two different pH values (5.0 and 5.9) and two constant specific growth rates (0.02 and 0.04 1/h), maintained using exponential addition of methanol. All the productivity data presented rely on an active determination of trypsin obtained by proteolysis of the trypsinogen produced. The pH of the medium did not affect cell growth, but significantly influenced specific production of trypsinogen: A 1.7-fold higher concentration of trypsinogen was achieved at pH 5.9 (64 mg/L at 0.02 1/h) compared to pH 5.0. EGFP was primarily used to facilitate detection of intracellular protein over the biosynthetic time course. Using flow cytometry with fluorescence detection, cell disruption was avoided, and protein extraction and purification prior to analysis were unnecessary. However, Western blot and SDS-PAGE showed that cleavage of EGFP-trypsinogen fusion protein occurred, probably caused by Pichia-endogenous proteases. The fluorescence analysis did therefore not accurately represent the actual trypsinogen concentration. However, we gained new experimentally-relevant insights, which can be used to avoid misinterpretation of tracking and quantifying as well as online-monitoring of proteins with the frequently used fluorescent tags.

Indexed as

AnimalsCulture MediaGene ExpressionGreen Fluorescent ProteinsHydrogen-Ion ConcentrationPichiaProtein Processing, Post-TranslationalRecombinant Fusion ProteinsSwineTrypsinogenCulture Mediaenhanced green fluorescent proteinGreen Fluorescent ProteinsRecombinant Fusion ProteinsTrypsinogen

Identifiers

PMID29872953
OpenAlexW2805180981

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.