ArticleEuropean radiology2018
Left ventricular global myocardial strain assessment comparing the reproducibility of four commercially available CMR-feature tracking algorithms.
Article in European radiology, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 49 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
49 citing papers in PubMed.
- Anterior STEMI associated with decreased strain in remote cardiac myocardium.The international journal of cardiovascular imaging · 2022Trial
- Head-to-head comparison of left ventricular strain assessed by CMR post-processing tools and fast strain-ENCoded imagingEuropean heart journal. Imaging methods and practice · 2026Article
- Reproducibility assessment of biventricular strain derived from Long-Axis feature tracking in travelling Volunteers - A study in the Berlin research network for cardiovascular magnetic resonance (BER-CMR).The international journal of cardiovascular imaging · 2025Article
- The Impact of Model-based Deep-learning Reconstruction Compared with that of Compressed Sensing-Sensitivity Encoding on the Image Quality and Precision of Cine Cardiac MR in Evaluating Left-ventricular Volume and Strain: A Study on Healthy Volunteers.Magnetic resonance in medical sciences : MRMS : an official journal of Japan Society of Magnetic Resonance in Medicine · 2025Article
- Inter-technique agreement of left atrial and ventricular deformation analysis: a comparison between transthoracic echocardiography and cardiovascular magnetic resonance imaging.Echo research and practice · 2025Article
- Potential Prognostic Impact of High-Sensitivity C-Reactive Protein in the Analysis of Whole-Heart Myocardial Mechanics and Morphometry: Prospective CMR-Based Study.Clinical Medicine Insights. Cardiology · 2025Article
- Improve myocardial strain estimation based on deformable groupwise registration with a locally low-rank dissimilarity metric.BMC medical imaging · 2024Article
- Incremental Prognostic Value of Cardiac MRI Feature Tracking and T1 Mapping in Arrhythmogenic Right Ventricular Cardiomyopathy.Radiology. Cardiothoracic imaging · 2024Article
- Potential prognostic impact of left-ventricular global longitudinal strain in analysis of whole-heart myocardial mechanics in nonischemic dilated cardiomyopathy.The international journal of cardiovascular imaging · 2024Article
- Comparing Strain Assessment in Compressed Sensing and Conventional Cine MRI.Journal of imaging informatics in medicine · 2024Article
- Association of uncertain significance genetic variants with myocardial mechanics and morphometrics in patients with nonischemic dilated cardiomyopathy.BMC cardiovascular disorders · 2024Article
- Article
- The effect of hyperlipidemia and body fat distribution on subclinical left ventricular function in obesity: a cardiovascular magnetic resonance study.Cardiovascular diabetology · 2024Article
- The effects of flip angle and gadolinium contrast agent on single breath-hold compressed sensing cardiac magnetic resonance cine for biventricular global strain assessment.Frontiers in cardiovascular medicine · 2024Article
- Comparison of classical Fabry and its p.D313Y and p.A143T variants by cardiac T1 mapping, LGE and feature tracking myocardial strain.Scientific reports · 2023Article
- The Interfield Strength Agreement of Left Ventricular Strain Measurements at 1.5 T and 3 T Using Cardiac MRI Feature Tracking.Journal of magnetic resonance imaging : JMRI · 2023Article
- Longitudinal CMR assessment of cardiac global longitudinal strain and hemodynamic forces in a mouse model of heart failure.The international journal of cardiovascular imaging · 2022Article
- Significance of Cardiac Magnetic Resonance Feature Tracking of the Right Ventricle in Predicting Subclinical Dysfunction in Patients with Thalassemia Major.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2022Article
- Impact of myocardial injury on regional left ventricular function in the course of acute myocarditis with preserved ejection fraction: insights from segmental feature tracking strain analysis using cine cardiac MRI.The international journal of cardiovascular imaging · 2022Article
- State-of-the-art myocardial strain by CMR feature tracking: clinical applications and future perspectives.European radiology · 2022Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectivesTo compare the reproducibility of cardiovascular magnetic resonance feature-tracking (CMR-FT) packages to assess global left ventricular (LV) myocardial strain.
methodsIn 45 subjects (i.e. 15 controls, 15 acute myocardial infarction, 15 dilated cardiomyopathy patients), we determined inter-vendor, inter-observer (two readers) and intra-observer reproducibility of peak systolic global radial, circumferential and longitudinal strain (GRS, GCS and GLS, respectively) comparing four commercially available software packages. Differences between vendors were assessed with analysis of variance (ANOVA), between observers and readings with intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) and coefficient of variation (CV).
resultsThe normalised end-diastolic volume was 91, 77 and 119 ml/m
conclusionsIn a cohort of subjects with a wide range of cardiac performances, GRS and GLS values are not interchangeable between vendors. Moreover, although intra- and inter-observer reproducibility amongst vendors is excellent, some vendors encounter problems to reproducibly measure global radial strain. KEY POINTS: • Different software packages are currently available for myocardial strain assessment using routinely acquired cine CMR images. • Global myocardial strain values are not interchangeable between vendors for global longitudinal and global radial strain. • Inter- and intra-observer reproducibility for global strain assessment is excellent. However, some vendors encounter problems to reproducibly measure global radial strain.
Indexed as
Identifiers
29872912What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.