Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29872878›Full record

ArticleDer Nervenarzt2018

[Nationwide survey of postgraduate medical training in clinical neurology].

A-S Biesalski, C Franke, D Sturm, J Behncke, T Schreckenbach, S Knauß, H Eisenberg, A Hillienhof, F Sand, M Zupanic

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Der Nervenarzt, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
1.5field-weighted citation impact, top 14% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed, 8 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. A nationwide survey on clinical neurophysiology education in Italian schools of specialization in neurology.Neurological sciences : official journal of the Italian Neurological Society and of the Italian Society of Clinical Neurophysiology · 2022
    Article
  8. Moral distress among residents in neurology: a pilot study.Neurological research and practice · 2021
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 8 institutions in 1 country.

A-S BiesalskiKlinik für Neurologie, St. Josef-Hospital, Ruhr-Universität Bochum, Bochum, Deutschland. anne-sophie.biesalski@rub.de.
C FrankeKlinik für Neurologie mit Experimenteller Neurologie, Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Berlin, Deutschland.
D SturmKlinik für Neurologie, Berufsgenossenschaftliches Universitätsklinikum Bergmannsheil, Bochum, Deutschland.
J BehnckePsychiatrische Klinik, Evangelisches Krankenhaus Alsterdorf, Hamburg, Deutschland.
T SchreckenbachKlinik für Neurologie, Rhein Maas Klinikum, Würselen, Deutschland.
S KnaußKlinik für Neurologie mit Experimenteller Neurologie, Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Berlin, Deutschland.
H EisenbergMedizinische Fakultät, Universität Göttingen, Göttingen, Deutschland.
A HillienhofJunge Neurologen, Deutsche Gesellschaft für Neurologie, Berlin, Deutschland.
F SandMedizinische Fakultät, Universität zu Köln, Köln, Deutschland.
M ZupanicDepartment für Humanmedizin, Didaktik und Bildungsforschung im Gesundheitswesen, Universität Witten/Herdecke, Witten, Deutschland.
Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin · DEWitten/Herdecke University · DEBG University Hospital Bergmannsheil Bochum · DEDeutsche Gesellschaft für NeurologieEvangelisches Krankenhaus Alsterdorf · DEKlinikum Rheine · DEUniversitätsmedizin Göttingen · DEUniversity of Cologne · DE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundCurrently, no data are available, which reflect the situation of medical doctors specializing in neurology in German hospitals. In order to secure the high standard of neurological patient care it is essential to evaluate the working conditions and the specialty training in neurology.

objectiveThis nationwide survey was conducted throughout Germany with the aim to address problems and to give suggestions for improvements in neurological training curricula. MATERIAL AND

methodsThe survey was online from February to May 2017 and 953 neurologists undergoing further training participated.

resultsMore than half of the young neurologists were satisfied with their medical training. One of the main problems that complicates clinical training is the workload. In addition, organizational obstacles within the clinic, such as poor structure of education or a lack of mentors, lead to dissatisfaction among participants. The size or type of the department, as well as the prevailing service system, exert only a minor influence on the quality of specialist training, although there were differences especially in the self-assessment of the participants in connection with the type of department (university hospital versus public or private hospital).

conclusionSpecialist training in neurology can be improved by simple arrangements, e. g., the introduction of a binding rotation scheme, internal mentoring and structured feedback. In addition, it will be necessary to relieve medical staff of administrative duties in order to create time for training and the learning of competencies.

Indexed as

NeurologistsNeurologyCurriculumGermanyHumansSurveys and QuestionnairesContinued educationEconomic pressureFeedbackPersonnel congestionResident

Identifiers

PMID29872878
OpenAlexW2807507616

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.