Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29872864›Full record

ArticleJAMA oncology2018

Prevalence of Clonal Hematopoiesis Mutations in Tumor-Only Clinical Genomic Profiling of Solid Tumors.

Ryan N Ptashkin, Diana L Mandelker, Catherine C Coombs, Kelly Bolton, Zarina Yelskaya, David M Hyman, David B Solit, José Baselga, Maria E Arcila, Marc Ladanyi and 4 more

Erratum issuedOpen access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in JAMA oncology, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 123 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
123citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
14.4field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

123 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 211 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Article
  4. Circulating tumor DNA-based detection of molecular residual disease in isocitrate dehydrogenase-mutant cholangiocarcinoma for biomarker-guided therapy.Clinical & translational oncology : official publication of the Federation of Spanish Oncology Societies and of the National Cancer Institute of Mexico · 2026
    Review
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. plasmaCHORD: A Machine Learning Approach to Distinguish Clonal Hematopoiesis-Derived Variants in Liquid Biopsies from Patients with Solid Tumors.Clinical cancer research : an official journal of the American Association for Cancer Research · 2026
    Article
  8. Review
  9. Review
  10. Mosaic Li Fraumeni Syndrome Not Identified in Germinal Tissue.Molecular genetics & genomic medicine · 2026
    Article
  11. Article
  12. Lexicon for Clonal Hematopoiesis in Liquid Biopsy.Clinical and translational science · 2026
    Article
  13. Review
  14. Langerhans cell sarcoma and myeloproliferative neoplasms: close or distant relatives?Virchows Archiv : an international journal of pathology · 2025
    Article
  15. Ageing, immune fitness and cancer.Nature reviews. Cancer · 2025
    Review
  16. Review
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Article

63 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

14 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Ryan N PtashkinDepartment of Pathology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York.
Diana L MandelkerDepartment of Pathology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York.
Catherine C CoombsDepartment of Medicine, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York.
Kelly BoltonDepartment of Medicine, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York.
Zarina YelskayaDepartment of Pathology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York.
David M HymanDepartment of Medicine, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York.
David B SolitDepartment of Medicine, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York.
José BaselgaDepartment of Medicine, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York.
Maria E ArcilaDepartment of Pathology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York.
Marc LadanyiDepartment of Pathology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York.
Liying ZhangDepartment of Pathology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York.
Ross L LevineDepartment of Medicine, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York.
Michael F BergerDepartment of Pathology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York.
Ahmet ZehirDepartment of Pathology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York.
Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center · USMolecular Oncology (United States) · USUniversity of North Carolina at Chapel Hill · US

Funding

X-RAY CRYSTALLOGRAPHYP30CA008748 · NCI · SLOAN-KETTERING INSTITUTE FOR CANCER RES · PI Nicholas D Socci · 1985 to 2026
$347.4M
UNC Oncology K12K12CA120780 · NCI · UNIV OF NORTH CAROLINA CHAPEL HILL · PI WILLIAM Y. KIM · 2007 to 2026
$9.6M
NCI NIH HHS K12 CA120780NCI NIH HHS L30 CA220884NCI NIH HHS P30 CA008748
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Importance: Although clonal hematopoiesis (CH) is well described in aging healthy populations, few studies have addressed the practical clinical implications of these alterations in solid-tumor sequencing. Objective: To identify and quantify CH-related mutations in patients with solid tumors using matched tumor-blood sequencing, and to establish the proportion that would be misattributed to the tumor based on tumor-only sequencing (unmatched analysis). Design, Setting, and Participants: Retrospective analysis of samples from 17 469 patients with solid cancers who underwent prospective clinical sequencing of DNA isolated from tumor tissue and matched peripheral blood using the MSK-IMPACT assay between January 2014 and August 2017. Main Outcomes and Measures: We identified the presence of CH-related mutations in each patient's blood leukocytes and quantified the fraction of DNA molecules harboring the mutation in the corresponding matched tumor sample. Results: The mean age of the 17 469 patients with cancer at sample collection was 59.2 years (range, 0.3-98.9 years); 53.6% were female. We identified 7608 CH-associated mutations in the blood of 4628 (26.5%) patients. A total of 1075 (14.1%) CH-associated mutations were also detectable in the matched tumor above established thresholds for calling somatic mutations. Overall, 912 (5.2%) patients would have had at least 1 CH-associated mutation erroneously called as tumor derived in the absence of matched blood sequencing. A total of 1061 (98.7%) of these mutations were absent from population scale databases of germline polymorphisms and therefore would have been challenging to filter informatically. Annotating variants with OncoKB classified 534 (49.7%) as oncogenic or likely oncogenic. Conclusions and Relevance: This study demonstrates how CH-derived mutations could lead to erroneous reporting and treatment recommendations when tumor-only sequencing is used.

Indexed as

AdolescentAdultAgedAged, 80 and overChildChild, PreschoolFemaleHematopoiesisHumansInfantInfant, NewbornMaleMiddle AgedMutationNeoplasmsRetrospective Studies

Identifiers

PMID29872864
PMCPMC6224316
OpenAlexW2805773873

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.