ArticlePlant methods2018
A simple and cost-effective method for screening of CRISPR/Cas9-induced homozygous/biallelic mutants.
Article in Plant methods, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 24 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
24 citing papers in PubMed.
- Global change-driven plant adaptive strategies and interspecific interaction networks: from molecular regulation to ecological management.Frontiers in plant science · 2026Review
- Applying conventional and cell-type-specific CRISPR/Cas9 genome editing in legume plants.aBIOTECH · 2025Review
- Genome editing in maize and sorghum: A comprehensive review of CRISPR/Cas9 and emerging technologies.The plant genome · 2025Review
- A Small Subunit of Geranylgeranyl Diphosphate Synthase Functions as an Active Regulator of Carotenoid Synthesis inInternational journal of molecular sciences · 2023Article
- Development of the CRISPR-Cas9 System for the Marine-Derived FungiJournal of fungi (Basel, Switzerland) · 2022Article
- CRISPR/Cas9-mediated P-CR domain-specific engineering of CESA4 heterodimerization capacity alters cell wall architecture and improves saccharification efficiency in poplar.Plant biotechnology journal · 2022Article
- Functional characterization and comparison of lycopene epsilon-cyclase genes in Nicotiana tabacum.BMC plant biology · 2022Article
- A Prospective Review on Selectable Marker-Free Genome Engineered Rice: Past, Present and Future Scientific Realm.Frontiers in genetics · 2022Review
- Harnessing tissue-specific genome editing in plants through CRISPR/Cas system: current state and future prospects.Planta · 2021Review
- Induced Genetic Variations in Fruit Trees Using New Breeding Tools: Food Security and Climate Resilience.Plants (Basel, Switzerland) · 2021Review
- CRISPR/Cas systems: opportunities and challenges for crop breeding.Plant cell reports · 2021Review
- CRISPR-Based Genome Editing Tools: Insights into Technological Breakthroughs and Future Challenges.Genes · 2021Review
- CRISPR/Cas9-Mediated Generation of Pathogen-Resistant Tomato againstInternational journal of molecular sciences · 2021Article
- CRISPR-Cas-Led Revolution in Diagnosis and Management of Emerging Plant Viruses: New Avenues Toward Food and Nutritional Security.Frontiers in nutrition · 2021Review
- Effective identification of CRISPR/Cas9-induced and naturally occurred mutations in rice using a multiplex ligation-dependent probe amplification-based method.TAG. Theoretical and applied genetics. Theoretische und angewandte Genetik · 2020Article
- Evaluation of the value of multiparameter combined analysis of serum markers in the early diagnosis of gastric cancer.World journal of gastrointestinal oncology · 2020Article
- Potential microRNA panel for the diagnosis and prediction of overall survival of hepatocellular carcinoma with hepatitis B virus infection.World journal of gastrointestinal oncology · 2020Article
- Clinical value evaluation of serum markers for early diagnosis of colorectal cancer.World journal of gastrointestinal oncology · 2020Article
- CRISPR/Cas9 Genome Editing Technology: A Valuable Tool for Understanding Plant Cell Wall Biosynthesis and Function.Frontiers in plant science · 2020Review
- Genome editing in grass plants.aBIOTECH · 2020Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
11 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundThe CRISPR/Cas9 system is being used for genome editing purposes by many research groups in multiple plant species. Traditional sequencing methods to identify homozygous mutants are time-consuming, laborious and expensive.
resultsWe have developed a method to screen CRISPR/Cas9-induced mutants through Mutation Sites Based Specific Primers Polymerase Chain Reaction (MSBSP-PCR). The MSBSP-PCR method was successfully used to identify homozygous/biallelic mutants in
conclusionsThe MSBSP-PCR method is simple to implement and can save time and cost in the screening of CRISPR/Cas9-induced homozygous/biallelic mutants.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.