Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29872437›Full record

ReviewFrontiers in immunology2018

Perspectives on Chimeric Antigen Receptor T-Cell Immunotherapy for Solid Tumors.

Paris Kosti, John Maher, James N Arnold

Open access · goldAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Frontiers in immunology, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 75 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
75citing papers in PubMed
6.3field-weighted citation impact, top 2% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

75 citing papers in PubMed, 121 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Trends in immunotherapy for oral squamous cell carcinoma.Cellular oncology (Dordrecht, Netherlands) · 2025
    Review
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. CAR-armored-cell therapy in solid tumor treatment.Journal of translational medicine · 2024
    Review
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Car T Cells in Solid Tumors: Overcoming Obstacles.International journal of molecular sciences · 2024
    Review
  13. CAR-macrophage: Breaking new ground in cellular immunotherapy.Frontiers in cell and developmental biology · 2024
    Review
  14. Review
  15. Review
  16. Review
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Article

15 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Paris KostiFaculty of Life Sciences and Medicine, School of Cancer and Pharmaceutical Sciences, King's College London, Guy's Hospital, London, United Kingdom.
John MaherFaculty of Life Sciences and Medicine, School of Cancer and Pharmaceutical Sciences, King's College London, Guy's Hospital, London, United Kingdom.
James N ArnoldFaculty of Life Sciences and Medicine, School of Cancer and Pharmaceutical Sciences, King's College London, Guy's Hospital, London, United Kingdom.
Guy's Hospital · GBKing's College Hospital NHS Foundation Trust · GBKing's College London · GB

Funding

European Research Council 335326
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Chimeric antigen receptor (CAR) T-cell therapy entails the genetic engineering of a patient's T-cells to express membrane spanning fusion receptors with defined specificities for tumor-associated antigens. These CARs are capable of eliciting robust T-cell activation to initiate killing of the target tumor cells. This therapeutic approach has produced unprecedented clinical outcomes in the treatment of "liquid" hematologic cancers, but to date has not produced comparable responses in targeting solid malignancies. Advances in our understanding of the immunobiology of solid tumors have highlighted several hurdles which currently hinder the efficacy of this therapy. These barriers include the insufficient accumulation of CAR T-cells in the tumor due to poor trafficking or physical exclusion and the exposure of infiltrating CAR T-cells to a panoply of immune suppressive checkpoint molecules, cytokines, and metabolic stresses that are not conducive to efficient immune reactions and can thereby render these cells anergic, exhausted, or apoptotic. This mini-review summarizes these hurdles and describes some recent approaches and innovations to genetically re-engineer CAR T-cells to counter inhibitory influences found in the tumor microenvironment. Novel immunotherapy drug combinations to potentiate the activity of CAR T-cells are also discussed. As our understanding of the immune landscape of tumors improves and our repertoire of immunotherapeutic drugs expands, it is envisaged that the efficacy of CAR T-cells against solid tumors might be potentiated using combination therapies, which it is hoped may lead to meaningful improvements in clinical outcome for patients with refractory solid malignancies.

Indexed as

Immunotherapy, AdoptiveAnimalsAntigens, NeoplasmBiomarkers, TumorCell MovementClinical Trials as TopicCytokinesCytotoxicity, ImmunologicHumansImmunomodulationInflammation MediatorsNeoplasmsReceptors, Antigen, T-CellReceptors, Chimeric AntigenSignal TransductionT-LymphocytesAntigens, NeoplasmBiomarkers, TumorCytokinesInflammation MediatorsReceptors, Antigen, T-CellReceptors, Chimeric Antigenchimeric antigen receptorimmunotherapysolid tumorT-cellstumor microenvironment

Identifiers

PMID29872437
PMCPMC5972325
OpenAlexW2799512975

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.