Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29872388›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in computational neuroscience2018

Data Driven Models of Short-Term Synaptic Plasticity.

Elham Bayat Mokhtari, J Josh Lawrence, Emily F Stone

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in computational neuroscience, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Modeling the Short-Term Dynamics ofThe Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience · 2020
    Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Elham Bayat MokhtariDepartment of Mathematical Sciences, The University of Montana, Missoula, MT, United States.
J Josh LawrencePharmacology and Neuroscience, Texas Tech University Health Sciences Center, Lubbock, TX, United States.
Emily F StoneDepartment of Mathematical Sciences, The University of Montana, Missoula, MT, United States.

Funding

Understanding the molecular mechanism of pathogenesis of prion diseasesP20RR015583 · NCRR · UNIVERSITY OF MONTANA · PI KAVANAUGH, MICHAEL PATRICK · 2000 to 2009
$17.6M
NCRR NIH HHS P20 RR015583
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Simple models of short term synaptic plasticity that incorporate facilitation and/or depression have been created in abundance for different synapse types and circumstances. The analysis of these models has included computing mutual information between a stochastic input spike train and some sort of representation of the postsynaptic response. While this approach has proven useful in many contexts, for the purpose of determining the type of process underlying a stochastic output train, it ignores the ordering of the responses, leaving an important characterizing feature on the table. In this paper we use a broader class of information measures on output only, and specifically construct hidden Markov models (HMMs) (known as epsilon machines or causal state models) to differentiate between synapse type, and classify the complexity of the process. We find that the machines allow us to differentiate between processes in a way not possible by considering distributions alone. We are also able to understand these differences in terms of the dynamics of the model used to create the output response, bringing the analysis full circle. Hence this technique provides a complimentary description of the synaptic filtering process, and potentially expands the interpretation of future experimental results.

Indexed as

causal state splitting reconstructionepsilon machinesinterneuron-pyramidal cell synapsesmutual informationshort term plasticitysynaptic filtering

Identifiers

PMID29872388
PMCPMC5972196

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.