Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29872161›Full record

ArticleEuropean journal of clinical nutrition2019

Association between hospitalization-related outcomes, dynapenia and body mass index: The Glisten Study.

Andrea P Rossi, Francesco Fantin, Pasquale Abete, Giuseppe Bellelli, Mario Bo, Antonio Cherubini, Francesco Corica, Mauro Di Bari, Marcello Maggio, Giovanna Maria Manca and 5 more

Open access · greenAbstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in European journal of clinical nutrition, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
0.7field-weighted citation impact, top 30% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 10 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Observational
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

15 authors at 8 institutions in 1 country.

Andrea P RossiDepartment of Medicine, Geriatrics Division, Healthy Aging Center Verona, University of Verona, Verona, Italy. andrea.rossi@hotmail.it.
Francesco FantinDepartment of Medicine, Geriatrics Division, Healthy Aging Center Verona, University of Verona, Verona, Italy.
Pasquale AbeteDepartment of Translational Medical Sciences, University of Naples Federico II, Naples, Italy.
Giuseppe BellelliSchool of Medicine and Surgery, Italy Geriatric Unit, S. Gerardo Hospital, University of Milano-Bicocca, Monza, Italy.
Mario BoGeriatrics and Bone Metabolism Disease Department, Citta' della Salute e della Scienza-Molinette, Turin, Italy.
Antonio CherubiniIRCCS-INRCA, Geriatria, Accettazione Geriatrica e Centro di ricerca per l'invecchiamento, Ancona, Italy.
Francesco CoricaDepartment of Clinical and Experimental Medicine, University of Messina, Messina, Italy.
Mauro Di BariDepartment of Experimental and Clinical Medicine, Research Unit of Medicine of Aging, University of Florence, Florence, Italy.
Marcello MaggioDepartment of Clinical and Experimental Medicine, Geriatric Rehabilitation Department, University of Parma, Parma, Italy.
Giovanna Maria MancaGeriatrics Department. SS, Trinità ASL 8, Cagliari, Italy.
Maria Rosaria RizzoDepartment of Medical, Surgical, Neurological, Metabolic and Geriatric Sciences, University of Naples, Naples, Italy.
Lara BianchiDepartment of Medical Science, University of Ferrara, Ferrara, Italy.
Francesco LandiDepartment of Geriatrics, Neurosciences and Orthopaedics, Catholic University of the Sacred Heart, Rome, Italy.
Stefano VolpatoDepartment of Medical Science, University of Ferrara, Ferrara, Italy.
GLISTEN Group Investigators
University of Verona · ITFondazione Ricerca Molinette · ITUniversità Cattolica del Sacro Cuore · ITUniversity of Ferrara · ITUniversity of Messina · ITUniversity of Parma · ITSantissima Trinità · ITUniversity of Milano-Bicocca · IT

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveTo compare the prognostic value of dynapenia, as evaluated by handgrip, and body mass index (BMI) on length of stay (LOS), days of bed rest, and other hospitalization-related outcomes in a population of older adults admitted to 12 italian acute care divisions.

methodsData on age, weight, BMI, comorbidities, ADL, physical activity level, muscle strength, were recorded at hospital admission. LOS, days of bed rest, intrahospital falls, and discharge destination were also recorded during the hospitalization. Subjects with BMI <18.5 kg/m

resultsA total of 634 patients, mean age 80.8 ± 6.7 years and 49.4% women, were included in the analysis. Overall dynapenic subjects (D) showed a longer period of LOS and bed rest compared with non-dynapenic (ND). When the study population was divided according to BMI categories, underweight (UW), normal weight (NW), and overweight-obese (OW-OB), no significant differences were observed in hospital LOS and days of bed rest. When analysis of covariance was used to determine the difference of LOS across handgrip/BMI groups, D/OW-OB and D/UW subjects showed significantly longer LOS (11.32 and 10.96 days, both p 0.05) compared to ND/NW subjects (7.69 days), even when controlling for age, gender, baseline ADL, cause of hospitalization and comorbidity. After controlling for the same confounding factors, D/OW-OB, D/NW and D/UW subjects showed significantly longer bed rest (4.7, 4.56, and 4.05 days, respectively, all p 0.05, but D/OW-OB p 0.01) compared to ND/NW subjects (1.59 days).

conclusionIn our study population, LOS is longer in D/UW and D/OW-OB compared to ND/NW subjects and days of bed rest are mainly influenced by dynapenia, and not by BMI class.

Indexed as

HospitalizationAged, 80 and overBody Mass IndexFemaleHand StrengthHumansItalyLength of StayMaleMuscle WeaknessObesitySocioeconomic Factors

Identifiers

PMID29872161
OpenAlexW2805400247

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.