Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29872112›Full record

Trial reportNeuropsychopharmacology : official publication of the American College of Neuropsychopharmacology2018

Response to therapeutic sleep deprivation: a naturalistic study of clinical and genetic factors and post-treatment depressive symptom trajectory.

Nina Trautmann, Jerome C Foo, Josef Frank, Stephanie H Witt, Fabian Streit, Jens Treutlein, Steffen Conrad von Heydendorff, Maria Gilles, Andreas J Forstner, Ulrich Ebner-Priemer and 4 more

Abstract readPragmatic Clinical Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in Neuropsychopharmacology : official publication of the American College of Neuropsychopharmacology, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. The future of rodent models in depression research.Nature reviews. Neuroscience · 2019
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

14 authors.

Nina TrautmannCentral Institute of Mental Health, Department of Genetic Epidemiology in Psychiatry, Medical Faculty Mannheim, University of Heidelberg, J5 68159, Mannheim, Germany.
Jerome C FooCentral Institute of Mental Health, Department of Genetic Epidemiology in Psychiatry, Medical Faculty Mannheim, University of Heidelberg, J5 68159, Mannheim, Germany. jerome.foo@zi-mannheim.de.
Josef FrankCentral Institute of Mental Health, Department of Genetic Epidemiology in Psychiatry, Medical Faculty Mannheim, University of Heidelberg, J5 68159, Mannheim, Germany.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-4867-9465
Stephanie H WittCentral Institute of Mental Health, Department of Genetic Epidemiology in Psychiatry, Medical Faculty Mannheim, University of Heidelberg, J5 68159, Mannheim, Germany.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-1571-1468
Fabian StreitCentral Institute of Mental Health, Department of Genetic Epidemiology in Psychiatry, Medical Faculty Mannheim, University of Heidelberg, J5 68159, Mannheim, Germany.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-1080-4339
Jens TreutleinCentral Institute of Mental Health, Department of Genetic Epidemiology in Psychiatry, Medical Faculty Mannheim, University of Heidelberg, J5 68159, Mannheim, Germany.
Steffen Conrad von HeydendorffCentral Institute of Mental Health, Department of Psychiatry and Psychotherapy, Medical Faculty Mannheim, University of Heidelberg, J5 68159, Mannheim, Germany.
Maria GillesCentral Institute of Mental Health, Department of Psychiatry and Psychotherapy, Medical Faculty Mannheim, University of Heidelberg, J5 68159, Mannheim, Germany.
Andreas J ForstnerInstitute of Human Genetics, University of Bonn School of Medicine & University Hospital Bonn, Sigmund-Freud-Straße 25, 53127, Bonn, Germany.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-1876-6368
Ulrich Ebner-PriemerDepartment of Sport and Sport Science, Karlsruhe Institute of Technology. Engler-Bunte-Ring 16, 76131, Karlsruhe, Germany.
Markus M NöthenInstitute of Human Genetics, University of Bonn School of Medicine & University Hospital Bonn, Sigmund-Freud-Straße 25, 53127, Bonn, Germany.
Michael DeuschleCentral Institute of Mental Health, Department of Psychiatry and Psychotherapy, Medical Faculty Mannheim, University of Heidelberg, J5 68159, Mannheim, Germany.
Marcella RietschelCentral Institute of Mental Health, Department of Genetic Epidemiology in Psychiatry, Medical Faculty Mannheim, University of Heidelberg, J5 68159, Mannheim, Germany.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-5236-6149
Major Depressive Disorder Working Group of the Psychiatric Genomics Consortium

Funding

3/7 Psychiatric Genomics Consortium: Finding actionable variationU01MH109536 · NIMH · ICAHN SCHOOL OF MEDICINE AT MOUNT SINAI · PI CHARNEY, ALEXANDER W, HUCKINS, LAURA MARIANNE · 2016 to 2020
$2.7M
NIMH NIH HHS U01 MH109536
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Research has shown that therapeutic sleep deprivation (SD) has rapid antidepressant effects in the majority of depressed patients. Investigation of factors preceding and accompanying these effects may facilitate the identification of the underlying biological mechanisms. This exploratory study aimed to examine clinical and genetic factors predicting response to SD and determine the impact of SD on illness course. Mood during SD was also assessed via visual analogue scale. Depressed inpatients (n = 78) and healthy controls (n = 15) underwent ~36 h of SD. Response to SD was defined as a score of ≤ 2 on the Clinical Global Impression Scale for Global Improvement. Depressive symptom trajectories were evaluated for up to a month using self/expert ratings. Impact of genetic burden was calculated using polygenic risk scores for major depressive disorder. In total, 72% of patients responded to SD. Responders and non-responders did not differ in baseline self/expert depression symptom ratings, but mood differed. Response was associated with lower age (p = 0.007) and later age at life-time disease onset (p = 0.003). Higher genetic burden of depression was observed in non-responders than healthy controls. Up to a month post SD, depressive symptoms decreased in both patients groups, but more in responders, in whom effects were sustained. The present findings suggest that re-examining SD with a greater focus on biological mechanisms will lead to better understanding of mechanisms of depression.

Indexed as

AdultCohort StudiesFemaleHumansLongitudinal StudiesMajor Depressive DisorderMaleMiddle AgedPsychiatric Status Rating ScalesSleep DeprivationTreatment Outcome

Identifiers

PMID29872112
PMCPMC6224527

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.