Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29871953›Full record

ArticleProceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America2018

Individuality and slow dynamics in bacterial growth homeostasis.

Lee Susman, Maryam Kohram, Harsh Vashistha, Jeffrey T Nechleba, Hanna Salman, Naama Brenner

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 24 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
24citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

24 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Emergent Homeostasis and Degeneracy From Multi-Dimensional Attractors.BioEssays : news and reviews in molecular, cellular and developmental biology · 2026
    Review
  2. Nonlinear memory in cell-division dynamics across species.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2025
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Evolutionary Advantage of Cell Size Control.Physical review letters · 2025
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. The Brain's Best Kept Secret Is Its Degenerate Structure.The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience · 2024
    Review
  9. Nonlethal deleterious mutation-induced stress accelerates bacterial aging.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2024
    Article
  10. Chaos in a bacterial stress response.Current biology : CB · 2023
    Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Lee SusmanNetwork Biology Research Laboratory, Technion-Israel Institute of Technology, 32000 Haifa, Israel.
Maryam KohramDepartment of Physics and Astronomy, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA 15260.
Harsh VashisthaDepartment of Physics and Astronomy, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA 15260.
Jeffrey T NechlebaDepartment of Physics and Astronomy, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA 15260.
Hanna SalmanDepartment of Physics and Astronomy, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA 15260; hsalman@pitt.edu nbrenner@technion.ac.il.
Naama BrennerNetwork Biology Research Laboratory, Technion-Israel Institute of Technology, 32000 Haifa, Israel; hsalman@pitt.edu nbrenner@technion.ac.il.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Microbial growth and division are fundamental processes relevant to many areas of life science. Of particular interest are homeostasis mechanisms, which buffer growth and division from accumulating fluctuations over multiple cycles. These mechanisms operate within single cells, possibly extending over several division cycles. However, all experimental studies to date have relied on measurements pooled from many distinct cells. Here, we disentangle long-term measured traces of individual cells from one another, revealing subtle differences between temporal and pooled statistics. By analyzing correlations along up to hundreds of generations, we find that the parameter describing effective cell size homeostasis strength varies significantly among cells. At the same time, we find an invariant cell size, which acts as an attractor to all individual traces, albeit with different effective attractive forces. Despite the common attractor, each cell maintains a distinct average size over its finite lifetime with suppressed temporal fluctuations around it, and equilibration to the global average size is surprisingly slow ([Formula: see text] cell cycles). To show a possible source of variable homeostasis strength, we construct a mathematical model relying on intracellular interactions, which integrates measured properties of cell size with those of highly expressed proteins. Effective homeostasis strength is then influenced by interactions and by noise levels and generally varies among cells. A predictable and measurable consequence of variable homeostasis strength appears as distinct oscillatory patterns in cell size and protein content over many generations. We discuss implications of our results to understanding mechanisms controlling division in single cells and their characteristic timescales.

Indexed as

Cell CycleCell SizeEscherichia coliHomeostasisbacterial growthbiophysicsmicroorganism populationsphenotypic variabilitysingle-cell measurements

Identifiers

PMID29871953
PMCPMC6016764

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.