Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29871871›Full record

ArticleBiology open2018

Physiological evaluation of the behavior and epidermis of freshwater planarians (

Matheus Salgado de Oliveira, Karla Andressa Ruiz Lopes, Priscila Maria Sarmeiro Corrêa Marciano Leite, Flavia Villaça Morais, Nádia Maria Rodrigues de Campos Velho

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Biology open, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
0.6field-weighted citation impact, top 34% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 15 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Advances in ecotoxicological research using planarians: a comprehensive review.Environmental science and pollution research international · 2026
    Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Matheus Salgado de OliveiraPlanarian Laboratory, Nature Research Center, Faculty of Education and Arts, University of Vale do Paraíba, São José dos Campos, São Paulo 12244-000, Brazil.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-8650-0361
Karla Andressa Ruiz LopesPlanarian Laboratory, Nature Research Center, Faculty of Education and Arts, University of Vale do Paraíba, São José dos Campos, São Paulo 12244-000, Brazil.
Priscila Maria Sarmeiro Corrêa Marciano LeiteResearch and Development Institute, University of Vale do Paraíba, São José dos Campos, São Paulo 12244-000, Brazil.
Flavia Villaça MoraisLaboratory of Cellular and Molecular Biology of Fungi, Research and Development Institute, University of Vale do Paraíba, São José dos Campos, São Paulo 12244-000, Brazil flavia@univap.br.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-8576-9684
Nádia Maria Rodrigues de Campos VelhoPlanarian Laboratory, Nature Research Center, Faculty of Education and Arts, University of Vale do Paraíba, São José dos Campos, São Paulo 12244-000, Brazil.
Universidade do Vale do Paraíba · BR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Planarians are metazoan freshwater flatworms which are free-living organisms. Their body has pluripotent stem cell promoters of tissue regeneration capacity. The water temperature and the potential of hydrogen (pH) of lentic ecosystems are important factors involved in the distribution and abundance of these animals. Although the pH factor is directly related to the physiology and behavior of planarians, their adaptive and regenerating capacities still remain unknown. The Critical Thermal Maximum (CTM) is a very widespread method used in the evaluation of thermal tolerance. In this study,

Indexed as

EpidermisPhysiologyPlatyhelminthesStressors

Identifiers

PMID29871871
PMCPMC6031348
OpenAlexW2807617186

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.