Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29871632›Full record

ArticleBMC biology2018

Harnessing single-cell genomics to improve the physiological fidelity of organoid-derived cell types.

Benjamin E Mead, Jose Ordovas-Montanes, Alexandra P Braun, Lauren E Levy, Prerna Bhargava, Matthew J Szucs, Dustin A Ammendolia, Melanie A MacMullan, Xiaolei Yin, Travis K Hughes and 8 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC biology, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 27 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
27citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
2.6field-weighted citation impact, top 9% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

27 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 52 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Epithelial Reprogramming and Transition during Pulmonary Bioengineering.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2026
    Article
  6. bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2025
    Article
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Self-organization of organoids from endoderm-derived cells.Journal of molecular medicine (Berlin, Germany) · 2021
    Review
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

18 authors at 8 institutions in 1 country.

Benjamin E MeadDivision of Engineering in Medicine, Department of Medicine, Brigham & Women's Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA. bemead@mit.edu.
Jose Ordovas-MontanesKoch Institute for Integrative Cancer Research, MIT, Cambridge, MA, USA.
Alexandra P BraunDivision of Engineering in Medicine, Department of Medicine, Brigham & Women's Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA.
Lauren E LevyDivision of Engineering in Medicine, Department of Medicine, Brigham & Women's Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA.
Prerna BhargavaBroad Institute of Harvard and MIT, Cambridge, MA, USA.
Matthew J SzucsBroad Institute of Harvard and MIT, Cambridge, MA, USA.
Dustin A AmmendoliaDivision of Engineering in Medicine, Department of Medicine, Brigham & Women's Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA.
Melanie A MacMullanBroad Institute of Harvard and MIT, Cambridge, MA, USA.
Xiaolei YinDivision of Engineering in Medicine, Department of Medicine, Brigham & Women's Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA.
Travis K HughesHarvard-MIT Division of Health Sciences & Technology, Cambridge, MA, USA.
Marc H WadsworthKoch Institute for Integrative Cancer Research, MIT, Cambridge, MA, USA.
Rushdy AhmadBroad Institute of Harvard and MIT, Cambridge, MA, USA.
Seth Rakoff-NahoumDivisions of Infectious Diseases and Gastroenterology, Boston Children's Hospital and Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA.
Steven A CarrBroad Institute of Harvard and MIT, Cambridge, MA, USA.
Robert LangerHarvard-MIT Division of Health Sciences & Technology, Cambridge, MA, USA.
James J CollinsHarvard-MIT Division of Health Sciences & Technology, Cambridge, MA, USA.
Alex K ShalekHarvard-MIT Division of Health Sciences & Technology, Cambridge, MA, USA.
Jeffrey M KarpDivision of Engineering in Medicine, Department of Medicine, Brigham & Women's Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA. jmkarp@bwh.harvard.edu.
Broad Institute · USHarvard Stem Cell Institute · USBrigham and Women's Hospital · USHarvard–MIT Division of Health Sciences and Technology · USIIT@MIT · USAllen Institute · USBoston Children's Hospital · USHarvard University · US

Funding

VIRUS PRODUCTION COREP30CA014051 · NCI · MASSACHUSETTS INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY · PI MATTHEW G. VANDER HEIDEN · 1985 to 2026
$93.9M
Role of Negative Costimulation in Regulation of AutoimmunityP01AI039671 · NIAID · YALE UNIVERSITY · PI David A. Hafler · 1996 to 2026
$51.7M
Systems investigation of vaccine responses in B cell depleted autoimmune patientsU19AI089992 · NIAID · YALE UNIVERSITY · PI David A. Hafler, RUTH R MONTGOMERY · 2010 to 2026
$50.4M
STRUCTURE-FUNCTION RELATIONSHIPS IN THE ALIMENTARY TRACTP30DK034854 · NIDDK · HARVARD UNIVERSITY (MEDICAL SCHOOL) · PI WAYNE I LENCER · 1986 to 2026
$32.4M
Center for Cell CircuitsRM1HG006193 · NHGRI · BROAD INSTITUTE, INC. · PI BLAINEY, PAUL CLARK, HACOHEN, NIR · 2016 to 2020
$14.9M
Novel Biologic Therapies for GVHDR01HL095791 · NHLBI · SEATTLE CHILDREN'S HOSPITAL · PI KEAN, LESLIE S · 2010 to 2025
$13.3M
Quantitative and functional characterization of therapeutic resistance in cancerU54CA217377 · NCI · MASSACHUSETTS INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY · PI LAUFFENBURGER, DOUGLAS A · 2017 to 2021
$10.2M
PHOTOPOLYMERIZATION FOR NONINVASIVE CARTILAGE TISSUER01DE013023 · NIDCR · MASSACHUSETTS INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY · PI LANGER, ROBERT SAMUEL · 1998 to 2019
$6.8M
Engineered Induction of a Stem Cell Homing ResponseR01HL095722 · NHLBI · BRIGHAM AND WOMEN'S HOSPITAL · PI KARP, JEFFREY MICHAEL · 2010 to 2018
$3.9M
T cells in HCV/HIV co-infectionR01DA046277 · NIDA · MASSACHUSETTS GENERAL HOSPITAL · PI LAUER, GEORG MICHAEL · 2018 to 2022
$3.2M
An integrated multiplexed genomic assay for low input clinical samples1U24AI118672 · NIAID · BROAD INSTITUTE, INC. · PI SHALEK, ALEX K · 2015 to 2019
$2.0M
Clinical implementation of single cell tumor transcriptome analysisR33CA202820 · NCI · BROAD INSTITUTE, INC. · PI GOLUB, TODD R., JOHNSON, BRUCE E. · 2016 to 2018
$1.3M
Howard Hughes Medical InstituteNational Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases 5U24AI118672NCI NIH HHS P30 CA014051NCI NIH HHS R33 CA202820NCI NIH HHS U54 CA217377NHGRI NIH HHS 2RM1HG006193NHGRI NIH HHS RM1 HG006193NHLBI NIH HHS R01 HL095722NHLBI NIH HHS R01 HL095791NHLBI NIH HHS R56 HL126554NIAID NIH HHS K08 AI130392NIAID NIH HHS P01 AI039671NIAID NIH HHS R01 AI138546NIAID NIH HHS U19 AI089992NIAID NIH HHS U24 AI118672NIDA NIH HHS R01 DA046277NIDCR NIH HHS R01 DE013023NIDDK NIH HHS P30 DK034854NIGMS NIH HHS 1DP2OD020839NIH HHS 1R01AI138546NIH HHS 1R01DA046277NIH HHS 1R01HL126554NIH HHS 1R33CA202820NIH HHS 1U54CA217377NIH HHS 2R01HL095791NIH HHS 2U19AI089992
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundSingle-cell genomic methods now provide unprecedented resolution for characterizing the component cell types and states of tissues such as the epithelial subsets of the gastrointestinal tract. Nevertheless, functional studies of these subsets at scale require faithful in vitro models of identified in vivo biology. While intestinal organoids have been invaluable in providing mechanistic insights in vitro, the extent to which organoid-derived cell types recapitulate their in vivo counterparts remains formally untested, with no systematic approach for improving model fidelity.

resultsHere, we present a generally applicable framework that utilizes massively parallel single-cell RNA-seq to compare cell types and states found in vivo to those of in vitro models such as organoids. Furthermore, we leverage identified discrepancies to improve model fidelity. Using the Paneth cell (PC), which supports the stem cell niche and produces the largest diversity of antimicrobials in the small intestine, as an exemplar, we uncover fundamental gene expression differences in lineage-defining genes between in vivo PCs and those of the current in vitro organoid model. With this information, we nominate a molecular intervention to rationally improve the physiological fidelity of our in vitro PCs. We then perform transcriptomic, cytometric, morphologic and proteomic characterization, and demonstrate functional (antimicrobial activity, niche support) improvements in PC physiology.

conclusionsOur systematic approach provides a simple workflow for identifying the limitations of in vitro models and enhancing their physiological fidelity. Using adult stem cell-derived PCs within intestinal organoids as a model system, we successfully benchmark organoid representation, relative to that in vivo, of a specialized cell type and use this comparison to generate a functionally improved in vitro PC population. We predict that the generation of rationally improved cellular models will facilitate mechanistic exploration of specific disease-associated genes in their respective cell types.

Indexed as

GenomicsHumansModels, BiologicalOrganoidsPaneth CellsProteomicsSequence Analysis, RNASingle-Cell AnalysisStem Cell NicheChemical biologyDifferentiationIntestinal organoidIntestinal stem cellPaneth cellSingle-cell RNA-seqStem cell-derived modelsSystems biology

Identifiers

PMID29871632
PMCPMC5989470
OpenAlexW2805176058

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.