Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29871629›Full record

ArticleMalaria journal2018

Susceptibility of wild and colonized Anopheles stephensi to Plasmodium vivax infection.

Ajeet Kumar Mohanty, Praveen Balabaskaran Nina, Shuvankar Ballav, Smita Vernekar, Sushma Parkar, Maria D'souza, Wenyun Zuo, Edwin Gomes, Laura Chery, Shripad Tuljapurkar and 3 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Malaria journal, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Anopheles jamesii Supports Plasmodium vivax Sporogony under Laboratory Conditions.The American journal of tropical medicine and hygiene · 2024
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Infectivity of symptomaticCurrent research in parasitology & vector-borne diseases · 2023
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

13 authors.

Ajeet Kumar MohantyNational Institute of Malaria Research, Field Unit, Campal, Goa, 403001, India.
Praveen Balabaskaran NinaDepartments of Chemistry and Global Health, University of Washington, Seattle, WA, 98195, USA.
Shuvankar BallavNational Institute of Malaria Research, Field Unit, Campal, Goa, 403001, India.
Smita VernekarNational Institute of Malaria Research, Field Unit, Campal, Goa, 403001, India.
Sushma ParkarNational Institute of Malaria Research, Field Unit, Campal, Goa, 403001, India.
Maria D'souzaNational Institute of Malaria Research, Field Unit, Campal, Goa, 403001, India.
Wenyun ZuoDepartment of Biology, Stanford University, Stanford, CA, 94305, USA.
Edwin GomesGoa Medical College and Hospital, Bambolim, Goa, 403202, India.
Laura CheryDepartments of Chemistry and Global Health, University of Washington, Seattle, WA, 98195, USA.
Shripad TuljapurkarDepartment of Biology, Stanford University, Stanford, CA, 94305, USA.
Neena ValechaNational Institute of Malaria Research (ICMR), Sector 8, Dwarka, New Delhi, 110077, India.
Pradipsinh K RathodDepartments of Chemistry and Global Health, University of Washington, Seattle, WA, 98195, USA.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-7394-1360
Ashwani KumarNational Institute of Malaria Research, Field Unit, Campal, Goa, 403001, India. ashwani07@gmail.com.

Funding

Shared TechnologyU19AI089688 · NIAID · UNIVERSITY OF WASHINGTON · PI RATHOD, PRADIPSINH K. · 2010 to 2023
$22.4M
National Institutes of Health AI089688NIAID NIH HHS U19 AI089688
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundAs much as 80% of global Plasmodium vivax infections occur in South Asia and there is a shortage of direct studies on infectivity of P. vivax in Anopheles stephensi, the most common urban mosquito carrying human malaria. In this quest, the possible effects of laboratory colonization of mosquitoes on infectivity and development of P. vivax is of interest given that colonized mosquitoes can be genetically less divergent than the field population from which they originated.

methodsPatient-derived P. vivax infected blood was fed to age-matched wild and colonized An. stephensi. Such a comparison requires coordinated availability of same-age wild and colonized mosquito populations. Here, P. vivax infection are studied in colonized An. stephensi in their 66th-86th generation and fresh field-caught An. stephensi. Wild mosquitoes were caught as larvae and pupae and allowed to develop into adult mosquitoes in the insectary. Parasite development to oocyst and sporozoite stages were assessed on days 7/8 and 12/13, respectively.

resultsWhile there were batch to batch variations in infectivity of individual patient-derived P. vivax samples, both wild and colonized An. stephensi were roughly equally susceptible to oocyst stage Plasmodium infection. At the level of sporozoite development, significantly more mosquitoes with sporozoite load of 4+ were seen in wild than in colonized populations.

Indexed as

AnimalsAnophelesFemaleIndiaMosquito VectorsPlasmodium vivax

Identifiers

PMID29871629
PMCPMC5989471

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.