Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29871600›Full record

ArticleBMC infectious diseases2018

Brucella abortus: determination of survival times and evaluation of methods for detection in several matrices.

Rene Kaden, Sevinc Ferrari, Tomas Jinnerot, Martina Lindberg, Tara Wahab, Moa Lavander

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC infectious diseases, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 23 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
23citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

23 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Enhanced Isolation ofMicroorganisms · 2025
    Article
  3. Risk Assessment ofVeterinary sciences · 2025
    Article
  4. A detailed review of bovine brucellosis.Open veterinary journal · 2025
    Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Foods (Basel, Switzerland) · 2022
    Article
  15. Article
  16. Molecular detection of novelOpen research Africa · 2022
    Article
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Rene KadenNational Veterinary Institute, Uppsala, Sweden. rene.kaden@akademiska.se.ORCID 0000-0002-2111-9751
Sevinc FerrariNational Veterinary Institute, Uppsala, Sweden.
Tomas JinnerotNational Veterinary Institute, Uppsala, Sweden.
Martina LindbergNational Veterinary Institute, Uppsala, Sweden.
Tara WahabSwedish Forum for Biopreparedness Diagnostics, Umeå, Uppsala and Solna, Sweden.
Moa LavanderSwedish Forum for Biopreparedness Diagnostics, Umeå, Uppsala and Solna, Sweden.

Funding

Myndigheten för Samhällsskydd och Beredskap Anslag 2:4 Krisberedskap
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundBrucella abortus is a highly pathogenic zoonotic agent, tempting for the development of a rapid diagnostic method to enable adequate treatment and prevent further spread. Enrichment of the bacteria is often used as a first step in diagnostics to increase the bacterial number above the detection limit of the real-time PCR. The enrichment of Brucella spp. takes at least 3 days, which might be avoidable if sensitive PCR methods can be used. Since many matrices contain PCR inhibitors, the limit of detection (LOD) must be determined for each separate matrix. Another aim of this study was the determination of survival of Brucella abortus in the analyzed matrices.

methodsThe LOD for the detection of B. abortus in 14 matrices, relevant for human medicine, veterinary medicine and food and feed safety, was determined to evaluate the need of a pre-enrichment step prior to real-time PCR. The survival of B. abortus in the spiked matrices was tested by plate count in a 7-day interval for 132 days.

resultsThe limit of detection for B. abortus in most matrices was in the range of 10

conclusionsA direct PCR analysis without enrichment of bacteria saves at least 3 days. However, the limit of detection between direct PCR and plate count differs in a 10 fold range. We conclude that this lower sensitivity is acceptable in most cases especially if quick analysis are required.

Indexed as

AnimalsBrucella abortusBrucellosisDNA, BacterialFlourHumansLimit of DetectionMeatMilkReal-Time Polymerase Chain ReactionDNA, BacterialBrucella abortusDiagnosticsLimit of detectionSurvival time

Identifiers

PMID29871600
PMCPMC5989407

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.