Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29871596›Full record

ArticleBMC pregnancy and childbirth2018

Pregnant women's experiences with an integrated diagnostic and decision support device for antenatal care in Ghana.

Ibukun-Oluwa Omolade Abejirinde, Renate Douwes, Azucena Bardají, Rudolf Abugnaba-Abanga, Marjolein Zweekhorst, Jos van Roosmalen, Vincent De Brouwere

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC pregnancy and childbirth, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 32 papers, 8 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
32citing papers in PubMed, 8 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

32 citing papers in PubMed, 8 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Pooled it
  6. Pooled it
  7. Pooled it
  8. Pooled it
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Ibukun-Oluwa Omolade AbejirindeAthena Institute, Faculty of Science, Vrije Universiteit, Amsterdam, The Netherlands. i.o.abejirinde@vu.nl.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-0139-0541
Renate DouwesSimavi, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Azucena BardajíISGlobal, Hospital Clínic- Universitat de Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain.
Rudolf Abugnaba-AbangaPresbyterian Health Services-North, Bolgatanga, Upper East Region, Ghana.
Marjolein ZweekhorstAthena Institute, Faculty of Science, Vrije Universiteit, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Jos van RoosmalenAthena Institute, Faculty of Science, Vrije Universiteit, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Vincent De BrouwereDepartment of Public Health, Institute of Tropical Medicine, Maternal and Reproductive Health Unit, Antwerp, Belgium.

Funding

EACEA: Erasmus Mundus Joint Doctorate Fellowship Specific Grant Agreement: 2015-1595Life Sciences and Health for Development LSH14GH16
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundQuality antenatal care (ANC) is recognised as an opportunity for screening and early identification of pregnancy-related complications. In rural Ghana, challenges with access to diagnostic services demotivate women from ANC attendance and referral compliance, leading to absent or late identification and management of high-risk women. In 2016, an integrated diagnostic and clinical decision support system tagged 'Bliss4Midwives' (B4M), was piloted in Northern Ghana. The device facilitated non-invasive screening of pre-eclampsia, gestational diabetes and anaemia at the point-of-care. This study aimed to explore the experiences of pregnant women with B4M, and its influence on service utilisation ("pull effect") and woman-provider relationships ("woman engagement").

methodsThrough an embedded study design, qualitative methods including individual semi-structured interviews and non-participant observation were employed. Interviews were conducted with 20 pregnant women and 10 health workers, supplemented by ANC observations in intervention facilities. Secondary data on ANC registrations over a one-year period were extracted from health facility records to support findings on the perceived influence of B4M on service utilisation.

resultsWomen's first impressions of the device were mostly emotive (excitement, fear), but sometimes neutral. Although it is inconclusive whether B4M increased ANC registration, pregnant women generally valued the availability of diagnostic services at the point-of-care. Additionally, by fostering some level of engagement, the intervention made women feel listened to and cared for. Process outcomes of the B4M encounter also showed that it was perceived as improving the skills and knowledge of the health worker, which facilitated trust in diagnostic recommendations and was therefore believed to motivate referral compliance.

conclusionsThis study suggests that mHealth diagnostic and decision support devices enhance woman engagement and trust in health workers skills. There is need for further inquiry into how these interventions influence maternal health service utilization and women's expectations of pregnancy care.

Indexed as

Point-of-Care SystemsAdultDecision Support TechniquesFemaleGhanaHumansPatient ParticipationPregnancyPregnant PeoplePrenatal CareQualitative ResearchTelemedicineTrustYoung AdultAntenatalClinical decision supportGhanamHealthPrenatal screeningWoman-provider interaction

Identifiers

PMID29871596
PMCPMC5989381

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.