Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29871021›Full record

ReviewSeminars in liver disease2018

Emerging Technologies for the Diagnosis of Perihilar Cholangiocarcinoma.

Sumera I Ilyas, John Eaton, Ju Dong Yang, Vinay Chandrasekhara, Gregory J Gores

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Seminars in liver disease, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 28 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
28citing papers in PubMed
6.9field-weighted citation impact, top 3% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

28 citing papers in PubMed, 59 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Observational
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Review
  10. Review
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Advances in the management of cholangiocarcinoma.World journal of hepatology · 2021
    Review
  15. Review
  16. Cholangiocarcinoma.Nature reviews. Disease primers · 2021
    Review
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Sumera I IlyasDivision of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota.
John EatonDivision of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota.
Ju Dong YangDivision of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota.
Vinay ChandrasekharaDivision of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota.
Gregory J GoresDivision of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota.
WinnMed · USMayo Clinic · US

Funding

PILOT AND FEASIBILTY PROGRAMP30DK084567 · NIDDK · MAYO CLINIC ROCHESTER · PI GREGORY J. GORES · 2009 to 2026
$22.2M
Mechanisms of Carcinogenesis in Biliary EpitheliaR01DK059427 · NIDDK · MAYO CLINIC ROCHESTER · PI GORES, GREGORY J. · 2001 to 2016
$4.3M
Mechanisms of Carcinogenesis in Biliary EpitheliaR56DK059427 · NIDDK · MAYO CLINIC ROCHESTER · PI GORES, GREGORY J. · 2006 to 2006
$243k
NIDDK NIH HHS P30 DK084567NIDDK NIH HHS R01 DK059427NIDDK NIH HHS R56 DK059427
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The diagnosis of malignant biliary strictures remains problematic, especially in the perihilar region and in primary sclerosing cholangitis (PSC). Conventional cytology obtained during endoscopic retrograde cholangiography (ERC)-guided brushings of biliary strictures is suboptimal due to limited sensitivity, albeit it remains the gold standard with a high specificity. Emerging technologies are being developed and validated to address this pressing unmet patient need. Such technologies include enhanced visualization of the biliary tree by cholangioscopy, intraductal ultrasound, and confocal laser endomicroscopy. Conventional cytology can be aided by employing complementary and advanced cytologic techniques such as fluorescent in situ hybridization (FISH), and this technique should be widely adapted. Interrogation of bile and serum by examining extracellular vesicle number and cargo, and exploiting next-generation sequencing and proteomic technologies, is also being explored. Examination of circulating cell-free deoxyribonucleic acid (cfDNA) for differentially methylated regions is a promising test which is being rigorously validated. The special expertise required for these analyses has to date hampered their validation and adaptation. Herein, we will review these emerging technologies to inform the reader of the progress made and encourage further studies, as well as adaptation of validated approaches.

Indexed as

Bile Duct NeoplasmsBiomarkers, TumorCirculating Tumor DNADiagnostic ImagingDiffusion of InnovationEarly Detection of CancerEndoscopy, Digestive SystemHumansKlatskin TumorMolecular Diagnostic TechniquesPredictive Value of TestsPrognosisBiomarkers, TumorCirculating Tumor DNA

Identifiers

PMID29871021
PMCPMC6463495
OpenAlexW2806432068

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.