Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29870977›Full record

ArticleKidney & blood pressure research2018

Association of Intradialytic Hypertension with Left Ventricular Mass in Hypertensive Hemodialysis Patients Enrolled in the Blood Pressure in Dialysis (BID) Study.

Amith Roy Shamir, Ameet Karembelkar, Jonathan Yabes, Yi Yao, Dana Miskulin, Jennifer Gassman, David Ploth, Lavinia Negrea, Susan Paine, Mahboob Rahman and 3 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Kidney & blood pressure research, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
1.7field-weighted citation impact, top 17% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 22 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Intradialytic hypertension: epidemiology and pathophysiology of a silent killer.Hypertension research : official journal of the Japanese Society of Hypertension · 2022
    Review
  7. Observational
  8. Article
  9. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

13 authors at 7 institutions in 1 country.

Amith Roy ShamirRenal-Electrolyte Division, Department of Medicine, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, USA.
Ameet KarembelkarPrivate Nephrology Practice, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, USA.
Jonathan YabesCenter for Research on Heath Care, Division of General Internal Medicine, Department of Medicine and Biostatistics, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, USA.
Yi YaoCenter for Research on Heath Care, Division of General Internal Medicine, Department of Medicine and Biostatistics, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, USA.
Dana MiskulinNephrology Division, Department of Medicine, Tufts University, Boston, Massachusetts, USA.
Jennifer GassmanQuantitative Health Sciences Department, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, Ohio, USA.
David PlothNephrology Division, Department of Medicine, Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston, South Carolina, USA.
Lavinia NegreaNephrology and Hypertension Division, Department of Medicine, Case Western Reserve University, Cleveland, Ohio, USA.
Susan PaineDialysis Clinic, Inc., New Mexico, New Mexico, USA.
Mahboob RahmanNephrology and Hypertension Division, Department of Medicine, Case Western Reserve University, Cleveland, Ohio, USA.
Raymond Y KwongCardiovascular Division, Department of Medicine, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts, USA.
Philip ZagerDialysis Clinic, Inc., New Mexico, New Mexico, USA.
Manisha JhambRenal-Electrolyte Division, Department of Medicine, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, USA, jhambm@upmc.edu.
University of Pittsburgh · USCase Western Reserve University · USCleveland Clinic · USHarvard University · USMedical University of South Carolina · USTufts University · USUniversity of New Mexico · US

Funding

Single Nephron and MetabolomicsP30DK079307 · NIDDK · UNIVERSITY OF PITTSBURGH AT PITTSBURGH · PI KLEYMAN, THOMAS R · 2008 to 2022
$13.4M
Blood Pressure in Dialysis PatientsR01DK083424 · NIDDK · UNIVERSITY OF NEW MEXICO · PI MISKULIN, DANA C, PLOTH, DAVID W · 2010 to 2012
$1.6M
NIDDK NIH HHS P30 DK079307NIDDK NIH HHS R01 DK083424
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

BACKGROUND/

aimsIntradialytic hypertension (IDH), or paradoxical rise in blood pressure (BP) during hemodialysis (HD) is associated with increased morbidity and mortality. The association between IDH and increased left ventricular mass (LVM), a well-known risk factor for adverse cardiovascular outcomes in HD patients, has not been studied. The aim of our study is to evaluate the cross-sectional association of intradialytic change in BP with cardiac structure and function measured by cardiac MRI in hypertensive HD patients enrolled in the multi-center Blood Pressure in Dialysis (BID) clinical trial.

methodsParticipants in the BID study were categorized into 3 groups based on average change (Δ) in systolic blood pressure (SBP) (post-HD SBP minus pre-HD SBP) during HD over a 1 month period: group 1 - patients with an increase in SBP ≥ 10mm Hg during HD (IDH); group 2 -patients with SBP decrease of greater ≥10mm Hg during HD; group 3 - patients with SBP increase or decrease by < 10mm Hg during HD. LVM index (LVMI) was measured using cardiac MRI, which were centrally read. Baseline characteristics were compared in the 3 groups and multivariable regression models were fitted for the adjusted association of IDH with LVMI.

resultsAmong the 80 participants, 7 (8.8%) had IDH and had average Δ SBP 17.0 ± 10.1 mmHg during HD. Patients with IDH were less likely to be diabetic, had lower pre-dialysis SBP and lower percent interdialytic weight gain as compared to the other 2 groups (p=0.02, p< 0.001 and p=0.02 respectively). In multivariable regression analyses, IDH was significantly associated with LVMI (adjusted mean difference relative to SBP decreased group [95% confidence interval (CI)] = 12.5 [3.6, 21.5], p=0.01) after adjusting for age, sex, diabetes, IDWG%, pre-HD SBP and beta blocker use. Every 1 mm rise in ΔSBP during HD was associated with 0.2 g/m2 increase in LVMI in adjusted models (p=0.04).

conclusionIDH is independently associated with higher LVMI in hypertensive HD patients and may contribute to increased cardiovascular events.

Indexed as

AdultAgedBlood PressureCardiovascular DiseasesCross-Sectional StudiesFemaleHumansHypertensionHypertrophy, Left VentricularMagnetic Resonance ImagingMaleMiddle AgedRenal DialysisRenal Insufficiency, ChronicHemodialysisIntradialytic hypertensionLeft ventricular mass

Identifiers

PMID29870977
PMCPMC6487648
OpenAlexW2807486653

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.