Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29870374›Full record

ArticleIEEE transactions on medical imaging2018

Photoacoustic Source Detection and Reflection Artifact Removal Enabled by Deep Learning.

Derek Allman, Austin Reiter, Muyinatu A Lediju Bell

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in IEEE transactions on medical imaging, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 83 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
83citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

83 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Systematic review of artificial intelligence in brachytherapy.Journal of contemporary brachytherapy · 2026
    Review
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. A review of artificial intelligence in brachytherapy.Journal of applied clinical medical physics · 2025
    Review
  10. Deep Learning to Localize Photoacoustic Sources in Three Dimensions: Theory and Implementation.IEEE transactions on ultrasonics, ferroelectrics, and frequency control · 2025
    Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Deep learningJournal of biomedical optics · 2024
    Article
  17. Functional Photoacoustic Imaging for Placental Monitoring: A Mini Review.IEEE transactions on ultrasonics, ferroelectrics, and frequency control · 2023
    Review
  18. Review of Deep Learning Approaches for Interleaved Photoacoustic and Ultrasound (PAUS) Imaging.IEEE transactions on ultrasonics, ferroelectrics, and frequency control · 2023
    Article
  19. Article
  20. Article

23 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Derek Allman
Austin Reiter
Muyinatu A Lediju Bell

Funding

Coherence-Based Photoacoustic Image Guidance of Transsphenoidal SurgeriesR00EB018994 · NIBIB · JOHNS HOPKINS UNIVERSITY · PI BELL, MUYINATU A. LEDIJU · 2017 to 2019
$726k
Coherence-Based Photoacoustic Image Guidance of Transsphenoidal SurgeriesK99EB018994 · NIBIB · JOHNS HOPKINS UNIVERSITY · PI BELL, MUYINATU A. LEDIJU · 2015 to 2016
$176k
NIBIB NIH HHS K99 EB018994NIBIB NIH HHS R00 EB018994
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Interventional applications of photoacoustic imaging typically require visualization of point-like targets, such as the small, circular, cross-sectional tips of needles, catheters, or brachytherapy seeds. When these point-like targets are imaged in the presence of highly echogenic structures, the resulting photoacoustic wave creates a reflection artifact that may appear as a true signal. We propose to use deep learning techniques to identify these types of noise artifacts for removal in experimental photoacoustic data. To achieve this goal, a convolutional neural network (CNN) was first trained to locate and classify sources and artifacts in pre-beamformed data simulated with -Wave. Simulations initially contained one source and one artifact with various medium sound speeds and 2-D target locations. Based on 3,468 test images, we achieved a 100% success rate in classifying both sources and artifacts. After adding noise to assess potential performance in more realistic imaging environments, we achieved at least 98% success rates for channel signal-to-noise ratios (SNRs) of -9dB or greater, with a severe decrease in performance below -21dB channel SNR. We then explored training with multiple sources and two types of acoustic receivers and achieved similar success with detecting point sources. Networks trained with simulated data were then transferred to experimental waterbath and phantom data with 100% and 96.67% source classification accuracy, respectively (particularly when networks were tested at depths that were included during training). The corresponding mean ± one standard deviation of the point source location error was 0.40 ± 0.22 mm and 0.38 ± 0.25 mm for waterbath and phantom experimental data, respectively, which provides some indication of the resolution limits of our new CNN-based imaging system. We finally show that the CNN-based information can be displayed in a novel artifact-free image format, enabling us to effectively remove reflection artifacts from photoacoustic images, which is not possible with traditional geometry-based beamforming.

Indexed as

Deep LearningArtifactsHumansImage Processing, Computer-AssistedPhotoacoustic Techniques

Identifiers

PMID29870374
PMCPMC6075868

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.